Imagine creating a timeline of your country’s whole history stretching back to its inception.
It would be no small task, and simply weighing the relative importance of so many great people, technological achievements, and pivotal events would be a tiny miracle in itself.
While that seems like a challenge, imagine going a few steps further. Instead of a timeline for just one country, what about creating a graphical timeline showing the history of the entire world over a 4,000 year time period, all while having no access to computers or the internet?
An All-Encompassing Timeline?
Today’s infographic, created all the way back in 1931 by a man named John B. Sparks, maps the ebb and flow of global power going all the way back to 2,000 B.C. on one coherent timeline.
View a high resolution version of this graphic

Histomap, published by Rand McNally in 1931, is an ambitious attempt at fitting a mountain of historical information onto a five-foot-long poster. The poster cost $1 at the time, which would equal approximately $18 when accounting for inflation.
Although the distribution of power is not quantitatively defined on the x-axis, it does provide a rare example of looking at historic civilizations in relative terms. While the Roman Empire takes up a lot of real estate during its Golden Age, for example, we still get a decent look at what was happening in other parts of the world during that period.
The visualization is also effective at showing the ascent and decline of various competing states, nations, and empires. Did Sparks see world history as a zero-sum exercise; a collection of nations battling one another for control over scarce territory and resources?
Timeline Caveats
Crowning a world leader at certain points in history is relatively easy, but divvying up influence or power to everyone across 4,000 years requires some creativity, and likely some guesswork, as well. Some would argue that the lack of hard data makes it impossible to draw these types of conclusions (though there have been other more quantitative approaches.)
Another obvious criticism is that the measures of influence are skewed in favor of Western powers. China’s “seam”, for example, is suspiciously thin throughout the length of the timeline. Certainly, the creator’s biases and blind spots become more apparent in the information-abundant 21st century.
Lastly, Histomap refers to various cultural and racial groups using terms that may seem rather dated to today’s viewers.
The Legacy of Histomap
John Spark’s creation is an admirable attempt at making history more approachable and entertaining. Today, we have seemingly limitless access to information, but in the 1930s an all encompassing timeline of history would have been incredibly useful and groundbreaking. Indeed, the map’s publisher characterized the piece as a useful tool for examining the correlation between different empires during points in history.

Critiques aside, work like this paved the way for the production of modern data visualizations and charts that help people better understand the world around them today.
Without a map who would attempt to study geography? –John B. Sparks
This post was first published in 2017. We have since updated it, adding in new content for 2021.
Military
Mapped: The Global Peace Index in 2026
This map ranks 163 countries in the 2026 edition of the Global Peace Index, highlighting where peace is strongest.
Published
21 hours ago
on
August 7, 2026
Mapped: The Global Peace Index in 2026
Key Takeaways
- Europe has the world’s largest concentration of highly peaceful countries in the 2026 Global Peace Index.
- Highly peaceful countries also appear across Asia-Pacific, the Americas, and Africa, showing that strong scores are not confined to one region.
- The lowest levels of peacefulness are concentrated in countries experiencing prolonged conflict and political instability.
This map shows how 163 countries are distributed across the Institute for Economics & Peace’s 2026 Global Peace Index, from countries with very high levels of peacefulness to those facing severe conflict and instability.
The geographic pattern is striking. Europe contains many of the world’s highest-rated countries, while clusters of very low peacefulness appear across parts of Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa.
The index draws on 23 indicators covering societal safety, ongoing conflict, political stability, terrorism, displacement, relations with neighboring countries, and militarization. Countries are grouped into five categories ranging from “Very High” to “Very Low” levels of peacefulness.
Where Peace Is Most Concentrated
Europe stands out as the strongest regional cluster on the map, with seven of the world’s 10 most peaceful countries located there.
| Rank | Country | Score | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇮🇸 Iceland | 1.161 | Very High |
| 2 | 🇳🇿 New Zealand | 1.343 | Very High |
| 3 | 🇨🇭 Switzerland | 1.363 | Very High |
| 4 | 🇸🇮 Slovenia | 1.369 | Very High |
| 5 | 🇮🇪 Ireland | 1.371 | Very High |
| 6 | 🇦🇹 Austria | 1.421 | Very High |
| 7 | 🇵🇹 Portugal | 1.427 | Very High |
| 8 | 🇸🇬 Singapore | 1.435 | Very High |
| 9 | 🇫🇮 Finland | 1.478 | Very High |
| 10 | 🇯🇵 Japan | 1.489 | High |
| 11 | 🇩🇰 Denmark | 1.504 | High |
| 12 | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | 1.513 | High |
| 13 | 🇨🇿 Czechia | 1.517 | High |
| 14 | 🇨🇦 Canada | 1.525 | High |
| 15 | 🇭🇺 Hungary | 1.538 | High |
| 16 | 🇧🇹 Bhutan | 1.546 | High |
| 17 | 🇳🇱 Netherlands | 1.566 | High |
| 18 | 🇲🇺 Mauritius | 1.586 | High |
| 19 | 🇱🇻 Latvia | 1.589 | High |
| 20 | 🇦🇺 Australia | 1.602 | High |
| 21 | 🇧🇪 Belgium | 1.608 | High |
| 22 | 🇵🇱 Poland | 1.615 | High |
| 23 | 🇭🇷 Croatia | 1.619 | High |
| 24 | 🇱🇹 Lithuania | 1.62 | High |
| 25 | 🇪🇪 Estonia | 1.623 | High |
| 26 | 🇧🇬 Bulgaria | 1.628 | High |
| 27 | 🇪🇸 Spain | 1.654 | High |
| 28 | 🇩🇪 Germany | 1.657 | High |
| 29 | 🇸🇰 Slovakia | 1.661 | High |
| 30 | 🇲🇪 Montenegro | 1.672 | High |
| 31 | 🇶🇦 Qatar | 1.676 | High |
| 32 | 🇹🇱 Timor-Leste | 1.681 | High |
| 33 | 🇳🇴 Norway | 1.688 | High |
| 34 | 🇲🇳 Mongolia | 1.692 | High |
| 35 | 🇮🇹 Italy | 1.712 | High |
| 36 | 🇦🇱 Albania | 1.725 | High |
| 37 | 🇺🇿 Uzbekistan | 1.726 | High |
| 38 | 🇬🇶 Equatorial Guinea | 1.729 | High |
| 39 | 🇬🇧 United Kingdom | 1.73 | High |
| 40 | 🇸🇪 Sweden | 1.732 | High |
| 41 | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | 1.738 | High |
| 42 | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | 1.751 | High |
| 43 | 🇺🇾 Uruguay | 1.754 | High |
| 44 | 🇰🇿 Kazakhstan | 1.771 | High |
| 45 | 🇷🇴 Romania | 1.788 | High |
| 46 | 🇲🇰 North Macedonia | 1.792 | High |
| 47 | 🇹🇯 Tajikistan | 1.799 | High |
| 48 | 🇧🇦 Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1.81 | High |
| 49 | 🇰🇼 Kuwait | 1.813 | High |
| 50 | 🇧🇼 Botswana | 1.823 | High |
| 51 | 🇦🇲 Armenia | 1.825 | High |
| 52 | 🇨🇱 Chile | 1.826 | High |
| 53 | 🇬🇷 Greece | 1.828 | High |
| 54 | 🇽🇰 Kosovo | 1.83 | High |
| 55 | 🇲🇩 Moldova | 1.836 | High |
| 56 | 🇬🇲 The Gambia | 1.837 | High |
| 57 | 🇰🇷 South Korea | 1.839 | High |
| 58 | 🇱🇦 Laos | 1.846 | High |
| 59 | 🇲🇬 Madagascar | 1.849 | High |
| 60 | 🇴🇲 Oman | 1.85 | High |
| 61 | 🇰🇬 Kyrgyz Republic | 1.853 | High |
| 62 | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | 1.86 | High |
| 63 | 🇳🇦 Namibia | 1.872 | High |
| 64 | 🇵🇾 Paraguay | 1.882 | High |
| 65 | 🇲🇦 Morocco | 1.887 | High |
| 66 | 🇹🇲 Turkmenistan | 1.903 | High |
| 67 | 🇱🇰 Sri Lanka | 1.91 | Medium |
| 68 | 🇯🇴 Jordan | 1.913 | Medium |
| 69 | 🇮🇩 Indonesia | 1.918 | Medium |
| 70 | 🇯🇲 Jamaica | 1.919 | Medium |
| 70 | 🇷🇸 Serbia | 1.919 | Medium |
| 72 | 🇦🇷 Argentina | 1.922 | Medium |
| 73 | 🇦🇪 United Arab Emirates | 1.927 | Medium |
| 74 | 🇸🇱 Sierra Leone | 1.937 | Medium |
| 75 | 🇸🇳 Senegal | 1.939 | Medium |
| 76 | 🇬🇭 Ghana | 1.943 | Medium |
| 77 | 🇹🇳 Tunisia | 1.947 | Medium |
| 78 | 🇦🇴 Angola | 1.955 | Medium |
| 79 | 🇹🇹 Trinidad and Tobago | 1.959 | Medium |
| 80 | 🇨🇾 Cyprus | 1.967 | Medium |
| 81 | 🇵🇦 Panama | 1.976 | Medium |
| 82 | 🇿🇲 Zambia | 1.992 | Medium |
| 83 | 🇲🇼 Malawi | 1.994 | Medium |
| 84 | 🇵🇬 Papua New Guinea | 2.002 | Medium |
| 85 | 🇬🇼 Guinea-Bissau | 2.012 | Medium |
| 86 | 🇱🇸 Lesotho | 2.016 | Medium |
| 87 | 🇱🇷 Liberia | 2.024 | Medium |
| 88 | 🇬🇹 Guatemala | 2.025 | Medium |
| 89 | 🇩🇴 Dominican Republic | 2.038 | Medium |
| 90 | 🇿🇼 Zimbabwe | 2.051 | Medium |
| 91 | 🇩🇿 Algeria | 2.053 | Medium |
| 92 | 🇧🇴 Bolivia | 2.054 | Medium |
| 93 | 🇨🇮 Côte d'Ivoire | 2.061 | Medium |
| 94 | 🇬🇪 Georgia | 2.066 | Medium |
| 95 | 🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia | 2.067 | Medium |
| 96 | 🇰🇭 Cambodia | 2.075 | Medium |
| 97 | 🇭🇳 Honduras | 2.075 | Medium |
| 98 | 🇹🇿 Tanzania | 2.08 | Medium |
| 99 | 🇫🇷 France | 2.083 | Medium |
| 100 | 🇬🇦 Gabon | 2.086 | Medium |
| 101 | 🇹🇭 Thailand | 2.089 | Medium |
| 102 | 🇵🇭 Philippines | 2.092 | Medium |
| 103 | 🇬🇾 Guyana | 2.093 | Medium |
| 104 | 🇸🇿 Eswatini | 2.095 | Medium |
| 105 | 🇩🇯 Djibouti | 2.098 | Medium |
| 106 | 🇳🇮 Nicaragua | 2.107 | Medium |
| 107 | 🇵🇪 Peru | 2.12 | Medium |
| 108 | 🇧🇭 Bahrain | 2.131 | Medium |
| 109 | 🇨🇺 Cuba | 2.139 | Medium |
| 110 | 🇦🇿 Azerbaijan | 2.142 | Medium |
| 111 | 🇳🇵 Nepal | 2.143 | Medium |
| 112 | 🇲🇷 Mauritania | 2.184 | Medium |
| 113 | 🇪🇬 Egypt | 2.186 | Medium |
| 114 | 🇷🇼 Rwanda | 2.2 | Medium |
| 115 | 🇧🇾 Belarus | 2.216 | Medium |
| 116 | 🇬🇳 Guinea | 2.22 | Medium |
| 117 | 🇧🇩 Bangladesh | 2.226 | Medium |
| 118 | 🇨🇳 China | 2.231 | Medium |
| 119 | 🇹🇬 Togo | 2.251 | Medium |
| 120 | 🇨🇬 Republic of the Congo | 2.256 | Medium |
| 121 | 🇸🇻 El Salvador | 2.264 | Medium |
| 122 | 🇧🇯 Benin | 2.293 | Medium |
| 123 | 🇿🇦 South Africa | 2.308 | Medium |
| 124 | 🇧🇷 Brazil | 2.333 | Medium |
| 125 | 🇱🇾 Libya | 2.361 | Low |
| 126 | 🇲🇿 Mozambique | 2.383 | Low |
| 127 | 🇮🇳 India | 2.409 | Low |
| 128 | 🇪🇷 Eritrea | 2.412 | Low |
| 129 | 🇧🇮 Burundi | 2.417 | Low |
| 130 | 🇺🇬 Uganda | 2.42 | Low |
| 131 | 🇱🇧 Lebanon | 2.435 | Low |
| 132 | 🇰🇪 Kenya | 2.447 | Low |
| 133 | 🇻🇪 Venezuela | 2.516 | Low |
| 134 | 🇺🇸 United States of America | 2.535 | Low |
| 135 | 🇪🇨 Ecuador | 2.539 | Low |
| 136 | 🇹🇷 Türkiye | 2.605 | Low |
| 137 | 🇨🇲 Cameroon | 2.634 | Low |
| 138 | 🇪🇹 Ethiopia | 2.648 | Low |
| 139 | 🇲🇽 Mexico | 2.65 | Low |
| 140 | 🇮🇶 Iraq | 2.662 | Low |
| 141 | 🇨🇴 Colombia | 2.735 | Low |
| 142 | 🇭🇹 Haiti | 2.755 | Low |
| 142 | 🇳🇬 Nigeria | 2.755 | Low |
| 144 | 🇮🇷 Iran | 2.759 | Low |
| 145 | 🇹🇩 Chad | 2.769 | Low |
| 146 | 🇳🇪 Niger | 2.832 | Low |
| 147 | 🇰🇵 North Korea | 2.845 | Low |
| 148 | 🇵🇸 Palestine | 2.877 | Low |
| 149 | 🇧🇫 Burkina Faso | 2.882 | Low |
| 150 | 🇨🇫 Central African Republic | 2.906 | Very Low |
| 151 | 🇲🇲 Myanmar | 2.911 | Very Low |
| 152 | 🇵🇰 Pakistan | 2.919 | Very Low |
| 153 | 🇸🇴 Somalia | 2.973 | Very Low |
| 154 | 🇲🇱 Mali | 2.996 | Very Low |
| 155 | 🇸🇾 Syria | 3.067 | Very Low |
| 156 | 🇾🇪 Yemen | 3.081 | Very Low |
| 157 | 🇦🇫 Afghanistan | 3.106 | Very Low |
| 158 | 🇸🇸 South Sudan | 3.116 | Very Low |
| 159 | 🇮🇱 Israel | 3.124 | Very Low |
| 160 | 🇺🇦 Ukraine | 3.184 | Very Low |
| 161 | 🇨🇩 Democratic Republic of the Congo | 3.189 | Very Low |
| 162 | 🇸🇩 Sudan | 3.195 | Very Low |
| 163 | 🇷🇺 Russia | 3.367 | Very Low |
The pattern extends beyond the very top of the index, with much of Northern and Western Europe falling into the higher-peace classifications.
Highly Peaceful Countries Outside Europe
Strong peace scores are not limited to Europe. Several countries across Asia-Pacific, the Americas, and Africa also rank highly.
New Zealand places second globally, while Singapore ranks eighth and Japan 10th. Canada ranks 14th and Australia 20th.
Smaller countries also stand out on the map. Bhutan, Mauritius, Timor-Leste, and Botswana are among the countries outside Europe with relatively high levels of peacefulness.
Where Very Low Peacefulness Is Concentrated
At the other end of the map, the lowest levels of peacefulness are concentrated in countries facing active conflict, civil unrest, or prolonged political instability.
Russia ranks last in the 2026 index, while Sudan, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ukraine, Israel, South Sudan, Afghanistan, Yemen, and Syria are also classified as having very low levels of peacefulness.
These countries form visible clusters across parts of Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa, illustrating how armed conflict and instability shape the global geography of peace.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Visualizing Law and Order Around the World on Voronoi.
Education
Mapped: U.S. Cities With the Most Educated Residents (2026)
Explore the 2026 ranking of U.S. cities with the highest educational attainment and strongest education systems.
Published
2 days ago
on
August 6, 2026
Mapped: U.S. Cities With the Most Educated Residents
Key Takeaways
- Ann Arbor ranks first overall, followed by Durham and San Jose.
- College towns and technology hubs account for many of the highest-ranked cities.
- Nearly half of the top 30 most educated cities are located on the East Coast.
This graphic ranks the most educated U.S. cities in 2026, highlighting metropolitan areas with high levels of educational attainment and strong local education systems.
The data for this visualization comes from WalletHub. Cities were ranked using a weighted composite score based on educational attainment (80%) and education quality and equality (20%).
College Towns Continue to Lead
Ann Arbor, Michigan, ranks first with an overall score of 94.48, driven by exceptionally high educational attainment.
| Rank | Most Educated Cities | State | Total Score (0-100) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ann Arbor | MI | 94.48 |
| 2 | Durham | NC | 85.00 |
| 3 | San Jose | CA | 82.67 |
| 4 | Washington | DC | 81.93 |
| 5 | Madison | WI | 79.62 |
| 6 | San Francisco | CA | 78.92 |
| 7 | Raleigh | NC | 77.88 |
| 8 | Boston | MA | 77.78 |
| 9 | Austin | TX | 76.46 |
| 10 | Seattle | WA | 75.21 |
| 11 | Portland | ME | 71.85 |
| 12 | Denver | CO | 71.37 |
| 13 | Colorado Springs | CO | 69.94 |
| 14 | Bridgeport | CT | 69.71 |
| 15 | Provo | UT | 69.55 |
| 16 | Portland | OR | 67.83 |
| 17 | Huntsville | AL | 67.69 |
| 18 | Minneapolis | MN | 66.72 |
| 19 | Baltimore | MD | 66.56 |
| 20 | Albany | NY | 66.49 |
| 21 | Trenton | NJ | 66.02 |
| 22 | San Diego | CA | 65.78 |
| 23 | Tallahassee | FL | 65.75 |
| 24 | Lexington | KY | 65.44 |
| 25 | Asheville | NC | 64.45 |
| 26 | Atlanta | GA | 64.03 |
| 27 | Charleston | SC | 63.52 |
| 28 | New Haven | CT | 62.75 |
| 29 | Hartford | CT | 62.63 |
| 30 | New York | NY | 62.48 |
More than 96% of adults in Ann Arbor have earned at least a high school diploma. The presence of the University of Michigan also contributes to the area’s highly educated population.
Durham, North Carolina, ranks second, reflecting the influence of Duke University and the broader Research Triangle.
Madison, Wisconsin, also earns a top-five finish, supported by the University of Wisconsin and a workforce anchored by government, health care, and research.
Technology Hubs Also Rank Highly
Several of the country’s leading technology centers rank among its most educated cities.
San Jose places third, followed by San Francisco in sixth and Seattle in 10th, reflecting the concentration of highly skilled workers in Silicon Valley and the Pacific Northwest.
Austin ranks ninth as its growing technology sector continues to attract graduates and professionals from across the country.
Washington, D.C., places fourth, supported by a highly educated workforce across government, consulting, law, and policy organizations.
The East Coast Has a Strong Presence
Nearly half of the top 30 cities are located on the East Coast, reflecting the region’s dense network of universities, research institutions, and knowledge-based industries.
Boston, Bridgeport, New Haven, Hartford, Albany, Trenton, Baltimore, and New York all make the list.
Many of these metropolitan areas benefit from long-term investment in higher education and proximity to major employers in finance, health care, biotechnology, and government.
Learn More on the Voronoi App 
If you enjoyed today’s post, check out Which U.S. States Depend Most on Manufacturing? on Voronoi.