Materials scientists put together a periodic table of substitute availability for metals, and the picture is grim
©iStock.com
Join Our Community of Science Lovers!
*Correction (3/17/15): The periodic table has been updated to include thallium.
Half a century ago only a handful of materials were in widespread use for consumer and industrial products—wood, iron and brick, to name a few of the most prominent ones. Today a single computer chip contains more than 60 elements, ranging from tungsten to ytterbium. Contemporary technology's reliance on such diverse resources, particularly metals, piqued the interest of Thomas Graedel, an environmental scientist at Yale University. With increasing demand for these elements, are replacements available if a shortage occurs?
In most cases, no. In fact, strong substitutes exist for none of the examined 62 metals or metalloids on the periodic table in all their uses, Graedel and his colleagues found after a comprehensive analysis of the elements' properties, life cycles and applications. And inadequate or nonexistent alternatives plagued a dozen metals when it came to their major uses. Replacements in these cases invariably would lead to degraded performance.
On supporting science journalism
If you're enjoying this article, consider supporting our award-winning journalism by subscribing. By purchasing a subscription you are helping to ensure the future of impactful stories about the discoveries and ideas shaping our world today.
There may be a silver lining to situational scarcities, however, Graedel says. They should inspire engineers to design completely novel, transformative materials.
SOURCE: “ON THE MATERIALS BASIS OF MODERN SOCIETY,” BY T. E. GRAEDEL ET AL., IN PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES USA, VOL. 112, NO. 20; MAY 19, 2015; Daisy Chung
It’s Time to Stand Up for Science
If you enjoyed this article, I’d like to ask for your support. Scientific American has served as an advocate for science and industry for 180 years, and right now may be the most critical moment in that two-century history.
I’ve been a Scientific American subscriber since I was 12 years old, and it helped shape the way I look at the world. SciAm always educates and delights me, and inspires a sense of awe for our vast, beautiful universe. I hope it does that for you, too.
If you subscribe to Scientific American, you help ensure that our coverage is centered on meaningful research and discovery; that we have the resources to report on the decisions that threaten labs across the U.S.; and that we support both budding and working scientists at a time when the value of science itself too often goes unrecognized.
In return, you get essential news, captivating podcasts, brilliant infographics, can't-miss newsletters, must-watch videos, challenging games, and the science world's best writing and reporting. You can even gift someone a subscription.
There has never been a more important time for us to stand up and show why science matters. I hope you’ll support us in that mission.