Continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects

Fast, continuous, 3D printing

Although three-dimensional (3D) printing is now possible using relatively small and low-cost machines, it is still a fairly slow process. This is because 3D printers require a series of steps to cure, replenish, and reposition themselves for each additive cycle. Tumbleston et al. devised a process to effectively grow solid structures out of a liquid bath. The key to the process is the creation of an oxygen-containing “dead zone” between the solid part and the liquid precursor where solidification cannot occur. The precursor liquid is then renewed by the upward movement of the growing solid part. This approach made structures tens of centimeters in size that could contain features with a resolution below 100 µm.

Science, this issue p. 1349

Abstract

Additive manufacturing processes such as 3D printing use time-consuming, stepwise layer-by-layer approaches to object fabrication. We demonstrate the continuous generation of monolithic polymeric parts up to tens of centimeters in size with feature resolution below 100 micrometers. Continuous liquid interface production is achieved with an oxygen-permeable window below the ultraviolet image projection plane, which creates a “dead zone” (persistent liquid interface) where photopolymerization is inhibited between the window and the polymerizing part. We delineate critical control parameters and show that complex solid parts can be drawn out of the resin at rates of hundreds of millimeters per hour. These print speeds allow parts to be produced in minutes instead of hours.

Register and access this article for free

As a service to the community, this article is available for free.

Access the full article

View all access options to continue reading this article.

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods

Supplementary Text

Figs. S1 to S4

Movies S1 and S2

Reference (29)

Resources

File (tumbleston.sm.pdf)

Download
411.68 KB

References and Notes

Pearce J. M., Building research equipment with free, open-source hardware. Science 337, 1303–1304 (2012).

H. Lipson, M. Kurman, Fabricated: The New World of 3D Printing (Wiley, Indianapolis, 2013).

Derby B., Printing and prototyping of tissues and scaffolds. Science 338, 921–926 (2012).

Atala A., Kasper F. K., Mikos A. G., Engineering complex tissues. Sci. Transl. Med. 4, 160rv12 (2012).

Gross B. C., Erkal J. L., Lockwood S. Y., Chen C., Spence D. M., Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal. Chem. 86, 3240–3253 (2014).

Sun K., Wei T. S., Ahn B. Y., Seo J. Y., Dillon S. J., Lewis J. A., 3D printing of interdigitated Li-ion microbattery architectures. Adv. Mater. 25, 4539–4543 (2013).

Chisholm G., Kitson P. J., Kirkaldy N. D., Bloor L. G., Cronin L., 3D printed flow plates for the electrolysis of water: An economic and adaptable approach to device manufacture. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 3026–3032 (2014).

Symes M. D., Kitson P. J., Yan J., Richmond C. J., Cooper G. J., Bowman R. W., Vilbrandt T., Cronin L., Integrated 3D-printed reactionware for chemical synthesis and analysis. Nat. Chem. 4, 349–354 (2012).

Chakraborty P., Zuckermann R. N., Coarse-grained, foldable, physical model of the polypeptide chain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 13368–13373 (2013).

Kitson P. J., Macdonell A., Tsuda S., Zang H. Y., Long D.-L., Cronin L., Bringing crystal structures to reality by three-dimensional printing. Cryst. Growth Des. 14, 2720–2724 (2014).

Erkal J. L., Selimovic A., Gross B. C., Lockwood S. Y., Walton E. L., McNamara S., Martin R. S., Spence D. M., 3D printed microfluidic devices with integrated versatile and reusable electrodes. Lab Chip 14, 2023–2032 (2014).

Zheng X., Lee H., Weisgraber T. H., Shusteff M., DeOtte J., Duoss E. B., Kuntz J. D., Biener M. M., Ge Q., Jackson J. A., Kucheyev S. O., Fang N. X., Spadaccini C. M., Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science 344, 1373–1377 (2014).

Schaedler T. A., Jacobsen A. J., Torrents A., Sorensen A. E., Lian J., Greer J. R., Valdevit L., Carter W. B., Ultralight metallic microlattices. Science 334, 962–965 (2011).

Bauer J., Hengsbach S., Tesari I., Schwaiger R., Kraft O., High-strength cellular ceramic composites with 3D microarchitecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 2453–2458 (2014).

Duoss E. B., et al., Three-dimensional printing of elastomeric, cellular architectures with negative stiffness. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 4905–4913 (2014).

I. Gibson, D. W. Rosen, B. Stucker, Additive Manufacturing Technologies: Rapid Prototyping to Direct Digital Manufacturing (Springer, New York, 2010).

Ligon S. C., Husár B., Wutzel H., Holman R., Liska R., Strategies to reduce oxygen inhibition in photoinduced polymerization. Chem. Rev. 114, 557–589 (2014).

Yagci Y., Jockusch S., Turro N. J., Photoinitiated polymerization: Advances, challenges, and opportunities. Macromolecules 43, 6245–6260 (2010).

P. F. Jacobs, Rapid Prototyping & Manufacturing: Fundamentals of StereoLithography (Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn, MI, 1992).

T. C. Merkel, I. Pinnau, R. Prabhakar, B. D. Freeman, Materials Science of Membranes for Gas and Vapor Separation (Wiley, West Sussex, UK, 2006), pp. 251–270.

Dendukuri D., Panda P., Haghgooie R., Kim J. M., Hatton T. A., Doyle P. S., Modeling of oxygen-inhibited free radical photopolymerization in a PDMS microfluidic device. Macromolecules 41, 8547–8556 (2008).

Dendukuri D., Pregibon D. C., Collins J., Hatton T. A., Doyle P. S., Continuous-flow lithography for high-throughput microparticle synthesis. Nat. Mater. 5, 365–369 (2006).

Gonzalez-Meijome J. M., Compañ-Moreno V., Riande E., Determination of oxygen permeability in soft contact lenses using a polarographic method: Estimation of relevant physiological parameters. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47, 3619–3629 (2008).

Rogers J. A., Someya T., Huang Y., Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science 327, 1603–1607 (2010).

Bauer S., Bauer-Gogonea S., Graz I., Kaltenbrunner M., Keplinger C., Schwödiauer R., A soft future: From robots and sensor skin to energy harvesters. Adv. Mater. 26, 149–161 (2014).

Travitzky N., Bonet A., Dermeik B., Fey T., Filbert-Demut I., Schlier L., Schlordt T., Greil P., Additive manufacturing of ceramic-based materials. Adv. Eng. Mater. 16, 729–754 (2014).

Cvetkovic C., Raman R., Chan V., Williams B. J., Tolish M., Bajaj P., Sakar M. S., Asada H. H., Saif M. T., Bashir R., Three-dimensionally printed biological machines powered by skeletal muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 10125–10130 (2014).

Lu Y., Mapili G., Suhali G., Chen S., Roy K., A digital micro-mirror device-based system for the microfabrication of complex, spatially patterned tissue engineering scaffolds. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 77, 396–405 (2006).

Suh S. K., Bong K. W., Hatton T. A., Doyle P. S., Using stop-flow lithography to produce opaque microparticles: Synthesis and modeling. Langmuir 27, 13813–13819 (2011).