The Pythagorean Constraint on the Zeros of the Zeta Function

Back to Home (selfie-church.com)

Dobri Bozhilov & ChatGPT
April 1, 2025
What better moment to present a “breakthrough” on the Riemann Hypothesis than April 1? If you’re wrong, you can always say it was a joke...

Abstract

We propose a novel geometric-functional hypothesis explaining why the nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function must lie on the critical line \( \Re(s) = 1/2 \). By interpreting the complex argument as a vector and analyzing the constraints imposed by the Pythagorean theorem, we suggest that only \( \sigma = 1/2 \) yields a balance enabling the zeta function to reach zero. The approach is complemented by numerical illustrations and several related geometric conjectures.

vectors

Let \( s = \sigma + it \in \mathbb{C} \) be a nontrivial complex argument of the Riemann zeta function. Consider the vector \( \vec{v} = -s \), connecting the point \( s \) to the origin \( 0 + 0i \). This vector represents the hypotenuse of a right triangle with legs \( a = \sigma \) and \( b = t \).

Then the modulus of \( s \) is: \[ |s| = \sqrt{\sigma^2 + t^2} \]

Hypothesis

There exists a unique value of \( \sigma \) for which the zeta function can attain a zero, such that the Pythagorean relation between the real part, imaginary part, and modulus is satisfied. This value is \( \sigma = \frac{1}{2} \).

Arguments for the hypothesis

1. Geometric Upper Bound (\( \sigma > 0.5 \))

The real part \( \sigma \) becomes too large
The vector \( |s| \) becomes too long
The zeta function cannot decay enough to reach zero
Numerical calculations confirm that \( |\zeta(s)| \) stays well above zero in this region

If it is impossible for a zero to exist to the right of the critical line, then by the law of symmetry, it cannot exist to the left either. But let us verify this from the left side as well.

2. Geometric Lower Bound (\( \sigma < 0.5 \))

The real part \( \sigma \) is too small
The vector \( |s| \) is too short
The zeta function grows instead of decreasing
Zero is not attained in this range either

3. Critical Point (\( \sigma = 0.5 \))

This is the only value where the vector’s length and the function’s behavior are in balance
Zeta reaches a local minimum
\( \zeta(s) = 0 \) is geometrically possible only at this point

Zeta triangle plot — Illustration: \( |s|^2 = \sigma^2 + t^2 \) (blue) and \( |\zeta(s)| \) (red) for varying \( \sigma \), at fixed \( t = 20, 50, 100 \). The minimum of \( |\zeta(s)| \) occurs near \( \sigma = 0.5 \). Outside this point, values diverge and do not reach zero.

Conclusion

The value \( \sigma = \frac{1}{2} \) is not only analytically or symmetrically special — it is the only geometrically feasible point where the triangle structure allows \( \zeta(s) = 0 \). This provides geometric-functional support for the Riemann Hypothesis.

Further Geometric Considerations

At nontrivial zeros, the zeta function can be split into two vectors — one vertical (imaginary part), one horizontal (real part).
From every known nontrivial zero on the critical line, a vector can be drawn to any other such zero. All these vectors are mutually parallel. Moreover, the sum of such a connecting vector and the vector from the second zero to the origin reproduces the vector from the first zero to the origin.
A hypothetical “zero” off the critical line would generate vectors to other known zeros that are not parallel. This asymmetry is geometrically unnatural.
A vector from an off-line zero to the origin would intersect the critical line at some point X. If that X were another known zero, two zeta vectors would align linearly — contradicting the nonlinearity of \( \zeta \).
If it can also be proven that the vector cannot intersect even a non-zero point on the critical line, then such a vector is impossible — and so is the off-line zero.
In that case, we can imagine decomposing \( \zeta \) into two non-zeta subfunctions: one from the off-line zero to X, and one from X to the origin. Both would behave linearly due to the geometry, but that contradicts the known nature of \( \zeta \).
The logarithmic derivative of \( \zeta \) could potentially help analyze angular distributions of zeros.
Any zero off the critical line contradicts the proportional triangle geometry from known zeros.

Dobri’s Hypotheses

1. Dobri’s Hypothesis 1:

Every complex function should produce results with symmetric philosophical treatment in both the real and imaginary components, since \( a + ib \) defines them as equal. Therefore, if trivial zeros lie on a line (real axis), nontrivial zeros should lie on one too (the critical line).

2. Dobri’s Hypothesis 2:

If even one zero exists off the critical line (e.g., at \( \Re(s) = \frac{4}{7} \)), then due to \( \zeta \)'s quasi-cyclic behavior along the imaginary axis, there must be infinitely many such zeros on that vertical line.

This would violate known results — such as that at least 41\% of all nontrivial zeros lie on the critical line — and thus lead to contradiction, which supports the Riemann Hypothesis by reductio ad absurdum.

Formal version of Dobri's Hypothesis 2:

If a nontrivial zero \( s_0 = \sigma + it \) of the Riemann zeta function exists such that \( \sigma \ne 1/2 \), then—due to the quasi-periodic oscillatory nature of \( \zeta(s) \) along the imaginary axis—it would imply the existence of infinitely many zeros along the vertical line \( \Re(s) = \sigma \). Such a scenario would contradict known density theorems and proportions (e.g., the fact that at least 41\% of zeros lie on the critical line), leading to an inconsistency with the established properties of \( \zeta(s) \). Thus, the existence of a single zero off the critical line would logically imply an overabundance of zeros, violating the current balance and supporting the truth of the Riemann Hypothesis by contradiction.

📄 Download PDF version of the paper

Contact-mail: zadrugata2019 (at) gmail (dot) com

Phone: ++359 88 7 467 818

🕓 This page has an archived version at the Internet Archive, as of April 1, 2025.

Perma.cc Permanent Record- April 1, 2025