How much money you need to make to be ‘middle class’ in every big city
washingtonpost.comThis discussion was held on the underlying Planet Money article [1] [2]
The problem then, and the problem now, is that this is arbitrarily defining middle class. Can't we just call this a boxplot[3] of income in major cities, and not make this into a discussion of what "middle class means"?
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9237345 [2] http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2015/03/19/394057221/how-much... [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Box_plot
For me middle class (in america) would mean:
- Being able to buy a house with a yard an hour or less away from work.
- Being able to buy the amount of cars needed (1 to 2 cars on average).
- Being able to afford groceries/health insurance/school for everyone in the family.
But I know this is pretty random, it's just my idea of middle class.
Exactly - in a well connected world/economy, local measurements of income don't mean much. As someone that's lived in and near Detroit, the incomes listed there have no relation to my idea of what's lower/middle/upper class. Most people in the area would probably peg those closer to what you see on Dallas or San Diego's charts. Detroit proper (as opposed to the sprawling Detroit area, which mostly looks like any suburban metro area) is simply a very poor city - I doubt it's much comfort to anyone making $30,000 there that they happen to fall in the middle, and I doubt that an employer would have any luck trying to pay an engineer a $60,000 "upper class" salary.
> I doubt that an employer would have any luck trying to pay an engineer a $60,000 "upper class" salary.
If they've graduated from Michigan within the past three months and have no other prospects. Maybe.
From the title: "...in every big city"
Houston, TX is the 4th largest city by population in the US (9th by area), but they put El Paso on there instead.