Show HN: Commit to open source and get Bitcoin tips
tip4commit.comI, for one, applaud the initiative, for which the bitcointalk forum announcement (by this post's submitter) exists here [0].
It's interesting to think of a system to support development of open source software, providing monetary compensation in addition to that feel-good feeling. The other day I was thinking if we could almost have a standardized commit message for developers seeking tips, something like <public bitcoin address><clearsignature of address with developers pgp key>, so that one could do this on a direct basis (and with certainty that their funds reach the dev).
This is NOT to say that I don't trust tip4commit, not at all. Think of the previous paragraph as an aside, a thought on how to tip in a way that guarantees all tips go to developers. If arsenische were less trustworthy there might be a greater argument, but I think people familiar with bitcointalk will know he's cool.
It's great to see an easy, less-painful, automatic way to have this done than simply looking up dev's addresses on an individualized basis (tedious if you like lots of projects).
Cool stuff.
Thanks for kind words!
I like your idea of putting developers' bitcoin address into commit message. I totally agree with you that direct tips are instant and reliable, they don't require trust to any third party.
However most developers probably don't even have a Bitcoin address, we hope to change that :)
What about the fact that each commit can be of wildly differing complexity and usefulness? It looks like in this system, a README typo fix would be worth exactly the same as fixing a threading deadlock issue.
Maybe in future we implement some other metrics, but as Palomides said, they can be gamed.
It is just a tip, some additional incentive to make new commits. Hopefully it will attract attention of new developers to the projects that are needed by people.
"use branches with atomic commits and then get paid for based on each commit in the branch" model will likely fix this
yeah, that does seem 'unfair,' but anything involving any sort of metric could also be gamed (whereas simple commit count is less likely to be easily manipulable on most projects).
Things like this is what makes Bitcoin so amazing. A billion people giving eachother a few dimes or dollars.
Free flow of value.
I added 10mBTC a few hours ago, and they haven't turned up on the site. Is there a long delay or something else?
A small bug caused this problem, we fixed it. Thanks for your message!
Thanks for the fix :)
compare: https://www.gittip.com/
Huge fan of what Gittip is doing, but they really should add bitcoin functionality. (They have some github issues about it.)
I think you could do better on the name. Coin4Commit :)
I do like the idea, but the current level of funding is ridiculous.
So I have three choices
1) Work on this opensource project and potentially make 0.077 bitcoins
2) Work on my projects / startup
3) Work for somebody else with guaranteed salary of $100-150/hr.
I don't see how #1 is competitive at all, unless you're an idealist.
I believe, personally, and know others who commit to open-source projects on a personal basis (and then those who I only read of on the internet), that many developers who work on these projects don't need monetary compensation in the normal sense.
Working on an OSS project is fulfilling in ways other than money, and some people really enjoy doing it in their spare time, etc. I know some of my friends from college who went off to do work at Facebook, Google, IBM, and they actually all enjoy submitting their code to open source projects for 0 dollars.
So while you're right there is some sort of "idealism" required, it's a common ideal in the culture of programming it seems. Supporting what one thinks is right, simply by nature of believing in it. Then you can go off to your day job at Google and make six figures.
I think you're confusing "tip" with "paycheck". That said, I would like to hope that the tip amounts will rise as the site gains traction.
Prior to this, you had three choices:
1) Work on this opensource project for free
2) Work on my projects / startup
3) Work for somebody else with guaranteed salary of $100-150/hr.
That lack of competitiveness doesn't seem to have stopped the success of open source.
The market pays a premium to buy your independence away from you. So I think there's an equilibrium where a job has the highest expected value (very low variance), a startup lower expected pay but more variance and open source really base pay but reputational opportunities.