Vastrm is the Warby Parker for shirts
bloomberg.com@jontang - First off I'll be the first positive voice in that there's quite possibly a niche of people crazy enough to pay $90+ for a polo shirt. That niche isn't likely going to be myself or in general the people here on HN, but it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
Regarding all the criticism/feedback that people are providing here - take it to heart. No, really - TAKE IT TO HEART. Reading through the list of comments it seems like everyone is providing similar criticisms (specifically that they'd never pay that much for a shirt and that they don't like the association with Warby Parker). While it's only natural to try to defend your position, I'd say really try to dig in and ask, "Is there a reason everyone is saying the same things or are they just misunderstanding my business?" If the latter, realize that this isn't a "People just don't understand us" issue like some type of angsty teenager, it's a flaw in how Vastrm is marketing itself and how potential customers see the potential benefit. This isn't something to be taken lightly and dismissed, this is something that has killed countless great businesses.
Everything aside - I don't really like polo shirts to begin with, but I wish you the best of luck.
Also, looking at the actual content on your front page I'm somewhat lost.
Slide 1/2 - Both slides push "New Designer Collections". What does that even mean? If Vastrm is positioning itself as high quality custom polos then everything on the site should speak to that level of quality and be recognizable as "designerware" by the Vastrm brand, not just because you say it's part of a designer collection."
Slide 3 - It's a decent idea in that it pushes something that I'm going to assume is unique about your brand (the woven collar), but I still have no idea what that means or how it's going to benefit me.
Slide 4 - vCool fabric? I don't particularly care that my shirt has "moisture wicking" fabric, I care that it's high quality, comfortable, and is going to help me look damn good.
Slide 5 - This is your entire business! Why in the hell is it the last slide? Less than 10% of people will ever stick around to see the last slide and it's the most important one you've got. The imagery itself leaves something to be desired, but designing my own shirt is one of the biggest selling point for Vastrm.
The thirds columns below are decent but aren't that convincing (first one is the best of the bunch but needs to be shown on an actual model showing how damn good of a fit it really is). What are these details that make it a luxury shirt? Why is the call to action on the video "Learn More" instead of "Watch the Video" or something more specific to its content?
The "Home Try On Program" block is again one of the most important parts of your business (it's risk free! Try it on and send what you don't like back!), and it's at the bottom of the page. Sell this idea!
Also, your 100 years of history looks great! This tells me your company has a story, a history. This is the type of BS that people love to know is there (even if they dont' bother reading the page) - that you're not some big chain retailer but a small business with a family history that's sticking it to "The Man".
The actual product grid pages look decent, but the single product pages are overwhelming me with an accordion of options. I understand the idea is allowing people to customize their shirt, but I'd have to click at least 20 different times to open/select each option and then add the product to cart.
Make it responsive!
Obligatory Plug - I'm an SF based web designer/front-end developer with experience doing responsive Magento stores for clients.
You make great points. We should talk.
Feel free to email me at rob@houseofatomi.com
The only correlation I see is that the polos are the same price as Warby Parker's eyeglasses. In my mind, Warby Parker saves me a bunch of money over the alternatives. This is not the same buisness model.
The comparison to Warby Parker was more in terms of customer engagement model vis a vis the home try on program. Cost structure, supply chain, mfr, and the competitive nature of our businesses are quite different, as you point out.
In light of that, isn't Zappos a more apt comparison?
Somewhat, but our customers aren't buying an off the rack shirt here. We are sending sizing templates for people to try on. They then go back to our site to determine any adjustments to their sizing profile (adding length to shirt or shortening a sleeve, or tapering the waist, etc). They send the try on shirts back to us and we then go ahead and make a one of kind size and fit for that customer based on their unique body type. make sense?
Yawn.
Plenty of companies already sell custom shirts online. What's the big deal about Vastrm? What's revolutionary?
Also, what's the big deal about Warby Parker? Just slick marketing and creation of a brand, but the same Chinese factories as used by CHEAP-GLASSES-FRAMES-DOT-COM.
EDIT:
Nice, a downvote after just a few seconds. Look, just because Vastrm is a YCombinator company doesn't mean it gets a free ride.
The interviewer asks why Vastrm is special and after some mumbling about an iPhone app and custom algorithms, the CEO admits that it all comes down to letting the user pick a couple of shirts and returning the ones that don't fit. Wow, why didn't anyone think of that before?!
There is nothing special about Vastrm. They are using celebrity endorsements like Will Smith to pimp their brand but at the end of the day the shirt is still made in a sweat-shop in Thailand. Instead of paying Vastrm $115 for each polo shirt, you're better off buying a plane ticket to Bangkok so you can enjoy a nice holiday whilst getting your custom suit, shirt and shoes made for a few bucks.
Most custom shirt companies out there only provide custom dress shirts and suiting. We are looking at going after the sportswear category. No one, we know, as of yet, has set up a supply chain and factory that can produce a quantity of one unit at a time without costing a fortune. The factories we use are part of a consortium that consults with the US gov't on setting up both labor friendly mfr abroad as well as clean mfr and eco friendly mfr processes. It's not a sweat shop. Sorry to disappoint. Also, this was not a free ride. We spent 2.5 years prior to YC setting up supply chain, factory, product development and a host of other logistical processes to be able to deliver quality and efficient production.
I've bought made to measure shirts from vendors like MyTailor.com. I'm an advocate, but I don't know many people who buy their shirts MTM on the internet (yet). Most men still by off the rack and the quality and fit is crappy and the price high.
Some of my colleagues do get MTM suiting made in places like Hong Kong and Thailand.
The apparel market is massive I think there is room for innovation.
This is great. I'm a huge fan of J Hilburn, but what I'm learning is, it's not binary. I also want sportswear, i want polos that fit, etc. The whole market for custom shirts is just opening up and my sense is that you'll get a ton of folks who have tried others and therefore are open to Vastrm.
Sure, that's what Apple says too, but look at the news today.
http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/sep/05/workers-ri...
You say you spent 2.5 years setting up a supply chain, but did you examine the possibility of manufacturing in the USA?
Given that your polo shirts start at $115, surely there's enough fat margin to allow for increased costs? The federal minimum wage is just above $7/hr. How long does it take to make a polo shirt?
Why did you choose Thailand and not the USA? That's the question the Bloomberg interviewer should have asked.
There are no manufacturer in the USA would allow us to produce one garment at a time. Most mfr. have minimum order requirements of approx. 1,000 pcs per style per color. We would not have been able to offer custom styling NOR custom fitting. We would just be another mass production brand, which is counter to what are purpose is. Unique style and size for every customer. Also, we could have processed orders through a network of tailors, but most tailors do not have patterns for sportswear, including polo shirts. And that would not have been a scalable model. hope that makes sense.
Didn't realize you were the founder.
In addition to my comments on your company name you should consider including a label of sorts somewhere on your shirt as a branding element (needs to be visible even if it hangs from the front or the tail). It doesn't have to be ala Polo or Tommy (over the chest) but there should be something to let people know that the product is yours.
Also I'm sure you have researched this but my gut says $100 is not the same as $98 in terms of consumer perception.
Please, no labels. Or if there are visible labels (beyond something small, tasteful, and discreet) have an option to remove them. I'd even pay a little extra for that option.
Thanks larrys. Greatly appreciate your thoughts and insights!
Actually, there is something special about Vastrm.
There are plenty of companies that do made to measure clothing online, but they require you to do a lot of measuring (either having someone measure your body, or taking a shirt that fits you well and measuring it). This is a somewhat involved and error prone process. What Vastrm is doing is letting you get some shirts in different sizes and fits, and then returning the ones that don't fit you well. That's very different than what the other companies MTM online sites offer. They generally have very restrictive return policies since the shirts were made custom for you.
As for Warby Parker, I've bought two pairs of eyeglasses and a pair of sunglasses from them, so I have a little more experience here. Buying glasses online was a bit of a crap shoot previously. You look at some frames online (the sites are pretty crappy) and find something you think might look good, and then order your glasses and have them shipped. Not ideal. What Warby Parker offers is for you to choose 5 frames, have them shipped to you, and then you get to try them on and figure out what works best. They also encourage you to share the photos on social media to get input from your friends. Clever marketing, but also pretty effective. As for the quality, in my experience their frames are of a higher quality than the much more expensive frames that I've been buying from my local optometrist. All this to say: Warby Parker combines great designs, an easy process, and high quality to make for a much better experience than exists today.
> They generally have very restrictive return policies since the shirts were made custom for you.
The two I've used, Black Lapel and Indo Chino, both allow you to return anything for any reason.
We offer no questions asked returns. If you don't like the shirt for any reason. We will refund you.
Ditto.
Look at Charles Tyrwhtt, they're in London, they ship custom shirts to anywhere in the world and you can return for any reason.
As a Warby Parker customer, I think the company is just at the tip of what they will accomplish. This is a gigantic market and most people are still paying $400 for same frames and lens you can get for $100 from them.
I've had two pair of glasses from them, and I've never had so many comments and compliments on a pair of glasses. So even if the glasses are made by the factories that make frames for other companies, there is something to be said about their design.
I'd love to see Warby Parker's disruptive strategy applied to other parts of the health care market. It shows what free market pressures can do to effect prices.
They have ads with hipsters wearing a thick frame eyeglass, so apparently it's hip or something.
I would expect you to be downvoted for your middlebrow dismissal of Warby Parker.
If an excellent web site, free try-at-home-program, low-prices, and social responsibility is what passes for "just slick marketing" I hope that more companies go for "just slick marketing".
This is like Zappos or a ton of other companies that offer free return shipping.. very little correlation to Warby Parker as mentioned.
Our customers aren't buying an off the rack shirt here. We are sending sizing templates for people to try on. They then go back to our site to determine any adjustments to their sizing profile (adding length to shirt or shortening a sleeve, or tapering the waist, etc). We then go ahead and make a one of kind size and fit for that customer based on their unique body type.
Warby Parker's value proposition isn't in a custom product, it's in having a product free of massive markup. Not sure where you are see the relationship between the two.
Being in the UK I haven't had the chance to use Warby Parker, but I have used "Glasses Online" which is our equivalent from what I've heard (home try-on, good range, very good prices).
Looking at Vastrm, apart from the home try-on it doesn't appear to be the same thing at all? The whole point (I thought) of the glasses retailers is getting great quality at realistic prices rather than prices that have been over inflated by the glasses monopoly that exists.
Vastrm on the other hand sells what look like good quality clothes at the same massively inflated fashion prices that other retailers sell at. $95 for a polo shirt? I'd expect more like $35 as a 'surprising' price.
TLDR; I was quoted £140 ($220) for a pair of glasses, I went to the UK equivalent of Warby Parker and got nicer ones for £60... and they were 'buy one get one free', so essentially £30 a pair. That's the sort of 'surprise' that Vastrm needs to create, and $95 polo shirts aren't going to do that.
Our value is not being a low cost leader. Our value is in getting people into shirts that fit perfectly. We hope to get our pricing down as we find efficiencies in the mfr and supply chain process. We are making one unit at a time. Not and easy problem to solve on the back end nor a cheap solution. But we are still on par with brands like Ralph Lauren, Hugo Boss, Fred Perry, Sunspel... And are less expensive than Armani, Varvatos, Zegna, etc...
Ok, fair enough if that's the market you're going for, but I don't consider it to be the same market as Warby Parker and equivalents as they emphasise the price as being an important factor.
Agreed.
Another interesting market for bespoke vs made-to-measure vs off the rack might be concealed carry. It is more of an issue for belts, and then kind of a toss up for pants and shirts. Unless you just go with skin tight clothing, it can be done with regular clothing now, but ccw and undercover people will spend a lot of money. It is a huge issue for women, though. (I know I'd probably never spend $80 on a regular belt, but I bought 3 without a second thought as gun belts, and I've bought $300 jackets for ccw or technical/outdoor use but unless it is a suit from ww chan, wouldn't spend it on regular clothing.)
People with physical deformities (what is a more polite way to say this?) could also be a market.
Yes, we have been approached by folks with physical disabilities that need custom solutions. We have been looking into that.
Another market where this might be awesome is corporate gifts. I also wouldn't buy a $115 polo shirt for myself, but I probably would consider it as a gift (as long as I could put my branding or message on the gift certificate, and ideally in the packaging of the actual shirt.)
Great point. And yes, we have been building our corporate business and decorating shirts with corporate logos.
I'm not an expert on Warby Parker but I don't see the connection.
Warby Parker took advantages of a business (eye glasses) which had greatly inflated prices and a few suppliers controlling the market. The shirt business isn't the same - there is plenty of competition, price points, and availability of product.
I won't make a guess on how good the vastrm idea is but it's no warby parker.
see above response...
First impressions count. And as they say in law calling it close to Warby Parker "doesn't pass the smell test".
Your points are valid (and I will take them as correct).
But when someone sees a headline that says "the Warby Parker of" they are going to think many different things and that's at least what I thought.
Clothing is sold everywhere eyeglasses are not. Custom clothing is nothing new what Warby did essentially was a new idea.
Note also that eyeglasses have been around forever and are used by a nice percentage of the population because if you need glasses and don't wear contact lenses you need glasses.
Polo shirts are not the same (title says "custom polo shirts") and I'm not even seeing that they sell polos for women. And how many men are "metro" enough that they even care about getting customer polo shirts? There is a big difference between men's fashion and women's fashion to begin with.
Great points here. Thanks for your insight. We will continue to learn from all these comments. re: men not caring about fitted polo shirts: we think the market here is fairly large. Mass merchandised clothing today only comes in 4 - 5 sizes (S, M, L, XL,etc...) but our bodies are all different shapes and sizes. So that size M that Jcrew or Ralph Lauren sells will only fit a sub-segment of the population. Everyone else is compromising on fit. If you want a better fitting shirt, come to us. If your willing to shop around for brands that fit your body type or if you don't care about fit, that is fine too. We are here to simply offer more choice for consumers.
I wish that sites like this would make it obvious (or easy to find out) what geographical area they serve without my having to work my way through a checkout process to figure it out.
apologies for this. We will fix this. We just started shipping to Australia, UK, Canada, France, Germany and Japan. More countries to come as we set up logistics in those countries.
I don't see the connection either. Warby Parker provides an experience that differs from their competition (luxottica) and happens to be significantly cheaper. How is Vastrm any different than a company like BlankLabel?
blank label makes only dress shirts and does not offer any sort of home try on program. We are big fans of Fan Bi and co.
re: a different experience. We are sort the anti-Gap. At the Gap, one size fits all. With us, we will fit the shirt to your body type and not force you into a size that was made for the masses.
Recently got a Vastrm hoodie and it is really nice. It certainly feels great and fits great. I'll likely wear it a ton, not sure why there is such negativity in this thread.
The quality of the shirt doesn't determine the quality of the business, or the quality of the comparison in the headline.
I think that he's actually joking. Because I'm not seeing that vastrm sells any hoodies.
We have been testing out hoodies as a follow on product through our retail channels as well as through a few crowd funding sites.
I added a polo shirt to the cart and it showed up as £115.00, which is about $180 USD. Is this a currency typo?
That $115 is in dollars. We only support USD at this point. Our site should not convert.
Here's what I see: http://imgur.com/KwNaq5a
thanks for taking the time to show us that. You would be charged in US $. We will look into this asap.
I said it last time they where discussed here but that name scares my manhood. :(
I suppose I'm Vastrm's target customer. I love polos and have a closet full of $100+ polos to prove it.
This said, I'm not really drawn to the offering:
1. I personally don't have a problem with fit. Many brands already offer different options (i.e. classic, slim, ultra-slim) and I'd find it hard to believe that there is a large number of individuals in the target market who can't find a brand that offers a satisfactory fit. If you're interested in wearing attractive, comfortable clothing, identifying the brands and fits that you like really isn't a big deal. And once you've done this, you generally don't need to revisit.
2. This isn't a suit. I have little interest in spending time designing a polo or seeking a more "perfect" fit for casualwear. Vastrm seems far less efficient than "take a trip to the mall."
3. I wouldn't consider myself a label snob, but the label and visible branding that often accompanies it is always reasonably going to be a part of the value proposition when it comes to clothing.
Give us a shot to get you perfectly fitted. We'll make the first shirt for you for free. send us an email at warriors@vastrm.com
Since naming is my thing I will add that the choice of vastrm as a name is horrible.
An invented word is fine but it should either relate to the product or at least be memorable and easy to pass along by mention. Especially for a consumer product which is marketed in part on a web site.
I don't know how to pronounce "vastrm" is it "vastrem" or "vastrim" or? ... and even if I did I'd have to spell it for someone since it's not close to being a word. It's a hack essentially.
Once again, they are, after all, selling to consumers.
vastrm makes me think of "rm *", actually. Which would be an awesome name for a document retention/destruction company.
Not only that but it made me think of "vasectomy" oddly enough.
Document destruction/retention: "rm"
but document retention "mv".
That's a great business by the way (destruction and document scanning). Destruction much easier though.
Vastrim AFAIK