Settings

Theme

Waymo – Dallas Open to All

waymo.com

83 points by xnx 2 hours ago · 77 comments

Reader

cortesoft 17 minutes ago

I live very close to LAX, and we have hundreds of Waymos in our area. At first i was a little weary, and kinda weirded out by all of them.

They have become completely normal, and cause WAY fewer traffic incidents than human drivers. They are very predictable, and will always let you pull in front of them when changing lanes (unlike a lot of other LA drivers).

I have seen a few incidents where they seem 'stuck', and it was a bit annoying and kind of funny, but again, it does not happen nearly as often as for human drivers.

I also like taking them. It is nice to just get in and relax and not have to talk to anyone or worry about who is going to pick you up. You can control the temperature and music from your phone, you can drop the pin exactly where you want to be dropped off and picked up, and the ride is smooth and comfortable.

We can debate all the knock on effects of Waymos, but the user experience is pretty great.

arjie 19 minutes ago

Surprisingly low hype for a company running perhaps the most advanced consumer-interactive robots. I’m quite fond of these machines and will periodically rescue them when someone has misused them (door not closed, most commonly). Hope they do well. Very good road participants.

  • cyanregiment 15 minutes ago

    Your brown nosing is not going to save you in the AI apocalypse.

    Lord Waymo (His Graciousness, Blessed Be His Name) will deal with you like the rest of us

hmokiguess 32 minutes ago

Missed opportunity to say "Open to Y'all"

daemonologist an hour ago

Service area: https://support.google.com/waymo/answer/9059119?hl=en#DAL

quxbar an hour ago

Here in Austin, I'm stuck calling an uber and hoping I get a Waymo. When does that deal expire?

semiquaver an hour ago

  > Dallasites
Is that seriously the demonym? Terrible. Try harder, Dallasites.
Cider9986 23 minutes ago

It does seem necessary to have cameras inside driverless cars but I don't want to if Google is running the show. Your biometrics will probably be stored for "enforcing Google's policies" at a minimum [1].

And then a Waymo dropped teenagers off at the police? I don't care if that was a human, I don't want no snitch car service [2].

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49027861

https://www.404media.co/waymo-called-police-on-teens-san-mat...

rawgabbit an hour ago

No freeways. But Waymo now is available to all of Dallas?

Does that include the suburbs?

Sheeny96 27 minutes ago

Why are the cars so big? Wouldn't it make sense to have a bunch of much smaller, single person vehicles?

  • cortesoft 22 minutes ago

    Why would it make more sense? It isn't like a car half the size would cost half as much, but it would severely limit the capacity. Now, you can get a waymo for 1-4 people, but if some (or all) were single occupant, you would be limited.

    Being smaller does not help that much much in cost per mile, but has a big cost for functionality.

  • jwpapi 24 minutes ago

    I’m thinking that since 2015. Like BMW C1 just with doors on the side and a bit more security. This would approx allow 3-4x as many travellers on a given route compared to traditional cars.

    • grim_io 16 minutes ago

      A C1 with more security, meaning more material and air between you and a potential high-speed obstacle, is called a car and is sized like one.

  • arccy 7 minutes ago

    Americans are fat, they don't fit.

  • smt88 20 minutes ago

    SFC costs don’t scale linearly with volume or number of seats.

    The cameras, LIDAR, and sensors are all fixed costs. You need them on even a single-person car. And they’re extremely costly.

seltzered_ 42 minutes ago

Something to hold in mind are the issues with scaling out to new cities in terms of safety risks: https://junkoyoshidaparis.substack.com/p/rapid-scaling-turns...

breckenedge 32 minutes ago

Service area is still miniscule.

elianaive 36 minutes ago

Keeps on being rolled out in red states while being delayed in blue states, quite unfortunate.

  • runako 23 minutes ago

    Divide this differently:

    - states where the major cities commonly have snow for > 3 months

    - states where the major cities commonly have snow for < 1 month

    Inclement weather is likely the differentiator. Blue state California gets Waymo in its biggest cities, which handily do not get much snow. The other Waymo cities are all below the Mason-Dixon Line.

  • cortesoft 21 minutes ago

    They have been fully open here in Los Angeles for almost two years now.

  • Zigurd 20 minutes ago

    It's easier to roll out in places where it seldom snows.

    • xnxOP 12 minutes ago

      Definitely true, but snow affecting driving conditions is becoming pretty rare in cities like Chicago.

  • dmitrygr 33 minutes ago

    "Maybe it's something you've got that they haven't got." - Owen Kellogg

  • mrtesthah 35 minutes ago

    Is it unfortunate, though?

  • km3r 33 minutes ago

    The anti-science slopulism of the far left is infecting blue states. Hopefully the liberal left can fight back to prevent the party being taken over like maga did to Republicans.

    • wwalexander 29 minutes ago

      What “anti-science slopulism” are you referring to? And what does corporate rollout strategy have to do with science?

      • xnxOP 9 minutes ago

        History of being anti-nuclear. Now against "AI" and self driving cars because they like trains.

airstrike 18 minutes ago

I love Waymo. The only problem I have with it is that it further siphons wages from local economies into Silicon Valley, beyond what Uber/Lyft already did.

yieldcrv 41 minutes ago

Waymo sells itself

People hate human drivers more than they hate the idea of AI drivers

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/04/business/uber-sexual-assa...

  • bicx 39 minutes ago

    It’s an extremely consistent experience, and you can sit in the front seat (something I like personally). With Uber and taxi services, you never know what kind of driver or ride you’re going to get.

    • ooopsss 21 minutes ago

      Uber is at least 1000x better than traditionally taxi, without any rating system.

      • sbuttgereit 10 minutes ago

        They use to be (along with Lyft). But it's been a very long time since that was clearly true.

        In reality I think you can get better experiences than a taxi with a rideshare service (which they really aren't for a very long time), but it's very hit or miss.

        So less consistently bad as a taxi service... but far from consistently good.

  • giancarlostoro 36 minutes ago

    The real test is, can these self-driving cars drive I-4 without getting into any sort of wreck?

    https://www.worldatlas.com/places/the-most-dangerous-highway...

Geezus_42 34 minutes ago

Dallas drivers are bad enough already...

ape4 27 minutes ago

Anyone with a credit card

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection