Settings

Theme

Jimothy the raccoon has a rare spinal condition. Here's what that means

popsci.com

62 points by speckx 5 days ago · 25 comments

Reader

ncr100 2 hours ago

According to a local Instagram posting he has difficulty traversing fence rails.

When he was young, a year ago, a neighbor saw his family helping him as he fumbled.

And so this neighbor says they cut open a hole in their fence at ground level for him.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Da5pCzqjhx1/ https://www.instagram.com/reel/Da9V4-FOjc_/

So some are appearing to enable this one critter.

Also locally - Seattle - local agencies are celebrating, and sometimes incorporating him into their business, including city sanitation departments spicing up pro social sanitation messages about using garbage cans, claiming Jimothy would want it that way. Some of these messages make less obvious sense than others, IMO.

  • Terr_ an hour ago

    > claiming Jimothy would want it that way.

    You might enjoy this satire [0], lengthily titled: "I’m Jimothy, the Short-Spined Raccoon Who Has Taken the Internet by Storm, and the Collective Weight of Your Adoration Is Breaking My Already-Compromised Back"

    [0] https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/im-jimothy-the-short-spi...

  • Larrikin 2 hours ago

    Are you complaining about people helping a raccoon? The Internet hype is a bit much but why are you framing it like this raccoon should have died years ago.

    • laweijfmvo 42 minutes ago

      it’ll probably end up badly, not because someone fed a raccoon, but because someone halfway across the planet will develop an unreasonable relationship with this wild animal.

    • hbarka an hour ago

      God forbid we put out a pan of dry kibbles for a stray cat or a water pan outside for hiking dogs during hot days. That would be “enabling”.

      • e_i_pi_2 28 minutes ago

        I do this too, but it's important to make sure you're either fully adopting them to keep them inside and care for medical issues, or at least make sure they get neutered/spayed before they're let out again if they can't live indoors. Stray cats are terrible for the local ecology- just feeding them without taking those steps is definitely harmful. In my town you can call animal control for strays and they'll clip the ears so you can see that they can't reproduce and are safe to leave out.

        I'd also be hesitant to give people the idea that racoons are safe to interact with, even stray cats can be dangerous, but racoons can do much more damage. I feel like the ideal situation is they capture him and find an animal sanctuary away from the public. Wild animals with genetic issues don't usually live a great life

      • BigTTYGothGF 38 minutes ago

        They can take my bird feeders from my cold dead hands.

      • Salgat an hour ago

        When I lived in Chicago I'd see rats and cats eating cat food left out alongside each other. I'm not against helping wild animals as long as it doesn't come with a rat infestation issue.

        • asdff 16 minutes ago

          It doesn't. You already have a rat infestation issue. This doesn't cause it or further it. You think that little handful of kibble compares to the free calories available in an entire dumpster full of chicago deep dish pizza scrap that sits out in the open air day in day out?

        • hbarka an hour ago

          I know that one. It’s the good ol’ tolerance formula:

          Tolerance(A) = { 100% if A ≠ B; 0% if A → B }

          Sprinkle on anything to suit your taste.

          • e_i_pi_2 23 minutes ago

            This does seem like an unfortunate truth of life, I always want to loan friends money, but can't afford to if they keep not paying me back :/

            I also want to put a bird feeder outside a window we have, but I know that'll mean bird poop on a walkway that other people use

            Same with some technology, I want to use X because it seems better but I know that'll mean it won't get the same support as Y so we have to use Y

    • MichaelZuo 16 minutes ago

      What planet are you living on?

      Homeowners are generally legally liable for anything that occurs on their property, especially if it can affect neighbouring properties to any provable extent.

      There are carveouts and exemptions, but that isn’t a magical deflector shield.

      So it doesn’t take a huge imagination to see how it could have negative externalities.

throw1234567891 2 hours ago

> You’d have to be living under a dumpster not to have heard of Jimothy, Seattle’s favorite raccoon and the internet’s newest folk hero.

Or anywhere outside of Seattle, I suppose.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection