Settings

Theme

Donut Lab's 'solid-state' battery exposed as regular li-ion in investigation

electrek.co

83 points by virgildotcodes 12 days ago · 22 comments

Reader

InTheArena 12 days ago

Ignore eletrek's self-serving post, go watch the youtube video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j5oyVNjrUPI

  • theamk 12 days ago

    If there is video and a text post, I think the text post is almost always better (except for the few rare cases where the text description is inadequate, like woodworking etc ...). The long videos where author just spends time talking are annoyingly slow, and looking at graphs in video player is simply miserable.

    Thank eletrek for converting information yo a much faster to comprehend form!

  • garciasn 12 days ago

    "As always, I respect your time,” but proceeds to have a 44m+ video.

    Just give me the text summary and be done with it.

    • xingped 12 days ago

      Yeah, these days I use the little Ask button to just give a summary of videos more and more. Most videos could have been an email. I'll usually only let videos run when I need background noise, when there's sufficient detail throughout that a summary wouldn't capture, or when it's not an informative video and there's actual value to me in letting it run, like humorous videos.

    • DemocracyFTW2 11 days ago

      Share your sentiment, but in this case the https://electrek.co article mentions Ziroth / Ryan as source of the information, and I'd guess (not seen the video though) as original research it carries enough weight to warrant that amount of time (which I'm very probably not going to spend, either).

    • nar001 11 days ago

      Honestly there's lots of details so I can see why it would need to be 44 minutes, and it's still a video that also has to explain complexe schemes with multiple companies too

  • HelloMcFly 12 days ago

    I would MAYBE watch a video on this topic if it were 4-6 minutes. 44 minutes? Is that really a better use of your time?

    • MisterTea 11 days ago

      > Is that really a better use of your time?

      Your time? That's content creators ad time.

ChiperSoft 12 days ago

Did they think nobody would notice? At some point somebody was bound to rip on open, or at least stick it in a CT scanner

tencentshill 11 days ago

It tarnishes my impression of Finland as well. I assumed scams like this didn't happen very much. I still assume justice will be served swiftly and they won't be able to worm out of it.

tomkarho 12 days ago

Guess Donut went with "fake it till you make it" business strategy but somewhere along the way forgot the "make it" part.

Saris 12 days ago

I've been waiting for more people to realize that their battery wasn't real, its specs were so outlandishly good they sounded completely impossible.

  • Bender 11 days ago

    For what it's worth there are a few of these in development but they are not ready for mass commercialization yet. Actual serious battery companies working on 3D printed solid state batteries that is, with actual real scientists. My interest has been entirely selfish. I want batteries that are lighter and will outlast my tools. I also want everything to have snap on or slide in batteries instead of being sealed in and not user serviceable.

    • Saris 11 days ago

      Oh I don't doubt they exist in a lab, but the idea that Donut had production ready ones was very far fetched from the beginning of this.

skullone 12 days ago

The early videos of their lab results looked a big enough scam that I couldn't believe people were buying the hype.

  • zormino 12 days ago

    A year ago this same guy was selling artificial super intelligence, right around the corner, and you'd get so rich if you would just give him some money. no idea why anyone believes the same guy when he pulls a new scam. I'm curious what he tries to pull next year.

fgclue 12 days ago

Well that sucks.

nom 12 days ago

no no, you see, that's exactly how our super secret chemistry solid state battery would measure! look at it, the curves aren't even similar, very different kink due to secret anode material that's definitely not graphite

it's real guys I swear

tmikaeld 12 days ago

Did someone actually pry a production cell open or is it more hearsay?

  • croes 12 days ago

    > electrochemical evidence — including voltage curves and cell expansion data — that conclusively identifies the tested cell as lithium-ion

eunos 11 days ago

After Northvolt now this. EU can't take a break

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection