Agentic Mfw
agenticmotherfucking.website> Accessibility doesn't matter when the content is engineered to be inaccessible to thought.
Act sarcastic all you want, that's a killer line. You do care.
The headline on that section, "Static sites are for people who can still read", caught me off guard.
Because it's also bullshit. "People who read" prefer static sites and not prefer any kind of interactivity is just fetishizing intelligence. Readers don't give a fuck if your site is coded in react or static, most of them dont even know web technology statistically. Projection at its peak
Yea definitely, anyone with different preferences from you is just virtue signaling and/or trying to flex on you. Seems super reasonable to me
Anyone who thinks their preferences translate to their viewers is not being honest with themselves. Developers care if your site is static or not, general visitors and web users do not. There is a reason why static sites are not the norm. You're trying to shoehorn your opinion and generalize it when in reality that's not the true. Thanks for mockery!
So we've gone from "anyone who expresses this preference is a snob" to "actually what matters is the preferences of some imaginary audience, who I can also speak for"
Fascinating
What's fascinating is your lack of interest in discussing the subject. Have a good day.
In a way, we're doing the same maneuver to avoid discussing the subject, deflecting to base insults involving psychoanalysis of the speaker based on their stated position rather than object-level engagement with the position per se. I agree that it's not a move that seems to invite meaningful discussion. Seems worth considering if that's a priority you have
yall, the line is referencing codegen & docsgen & slopgen; people are putting shit into the ether that neither them nor anyone else is going to read but will just be imbibed by some other agent for some random purpose no one strictly knows.
Aye, and the comment above mine was engaging with the line in a way that begged for mockery nonetheless
There are a few bangers in there
Out of curiosity, which AI persona should I attribute this writing to? Is this Claude?
Ya, it’s Claude
> get hired at a comp number that requires a comma you've never used before
Gotta hand it to Claude, that's almost a pretty decent line.
I’m pouring out a shot of Tres Comas for Claude right now
It feels good now to have watched the whole SV series. just knowing the inside jokes or the short clips on HN was worth it.
I've seen Claude come up with some pretty incredible bangers.
I mean, it's still obviously LLM-generated. But Claude's got a sense of humor if you prompt him right.
It’s so strange that the Claude-ness leaks out even when it’s prompted to use this tone. The underlying flavour shines through clearly. I’m sure you could get it to shake it with enough prompting
Did anybody consider that this was sarcastically hand-crafted with some obvious LLM-isms mixed in for the lulz? It goes both ways...
> but they get attention, and attention is the only metric left. Nobody's reading and you know it.
Its not every day I get called a nobody from a clanker, its true, but I still dont like to be called a nobody.
> The weights already ate it. Your CC0 footer is a fucking eulogy.
Made me wonder if there would ever be a copyleft reckoning to this whole thing. Probably not.
I'm fatigued by this hyperbole and profanity, especially when written by an LLM. There is too much of this. Human-written or not it makes it very difficult for me to engage with. The sentiment is bad. Is building this better than building nothing?
Just because this is how things are does not it's how they should be. I'm very tired.
This site is for the lolz and obviously following the style set by the previous mf websites. I find it cathartic to laugh at the ridiculousness of the situation we are in, but also genuinely engage with the neck breaking pace of change we are all having to adjust to.
And the LLM came up with some really funny lines
people were (rightfully) complaining about this kind of humor in 2019
https://dysfunctionalliteracy.com/2019/12/21/why-do-self-hel...
People complain about all things all the time (rightfully) but I'm not gonna complain about your complaints now, I will only add that I sometimes enjoy humor full of "shock" and profanity. Still! , After decades of professionals and non-professionals diluting it. This site was funny. Ymmv
Its a tale as old as time. I am 30 and still love fart jokes but I must accept that some people prefer the boring life and lost all humor.
> lost all humor. not to mention sense of smell
It is as "cathartic" as dropping n words everywhere. N this and that, that n president!
Author has incestual relationship in their family. At least in my country that is highly offensive. For the sake of their possible children / siblinks, I hope they use protection!
> Author has incestual relationship in their family.
Now I want to know in which culture this is used as a common insult.
I'm fairly certain most cultures have common use of incestual insults.
The english "mother fucker" is born of the original taboo of fucking one's mother. The act is seen as bad, so we use the phrase referencing the act as a label for all sorts of bad things. Like, you dropped a book on your foot, and that's as bad as someone who sleeps with their mum, so you say "mother fucker".
Spanish has tu chinga tu madre or just chinga tu madre.
Not sure off the top of my head, but I know there's lots of other cultures that use the same taboo in the same kind of substitional way.
Motherfucker ?
As a former 7th grader, I liked the style. If anything, the over-the-top-ness makes it less bitter and more of a self-parody. It's honest about its own immaturity, making everything lighthearted again.
It's also using only under-specific swearwords like 'm..f*king', which is not really instigating violence, attacking any characteristic directly, just exaggerated profanity to the point of unseriousness.
I'm not saying the style is good or that everyone should tolerate it, I'm saying only that for me the exaggeration softens out the sentiment. I'd argue it's also what you sing up given the URL.
It's actually amazing people try to disassociate LLM writing from humans; 10 years ago the same was about trolls and rage bait.
Ya'll should've already realized that finding a truth statement on the internet is a hazard not worth doing.
Now it's just worse because the sloptrolls dont even.
I for sure wouldn't want to be a mother on this website.
Edgy CS grad vibes.
Yeah and these children who have never seen an em dash in their life.
Plot twist, it was artisanally typed in emacs.
This is great satire. If you read it as a parody it's uncomfortable, if you read it straight it's uncomfortable but in a different way.
First they sell you the sickness and then they tell you the cure is too dangerous to release to the general public. Because their sickness will not sell.
Are you talking about Claude Mythos? /s
Why is this so good?
Probably because someone still cared a lot about the bit! And wow this is really quite good lol.
Commitment to the bit is the only way. None of that “I like it ironically” bs here
Exactly! Though it is sarcastic, it is the way in which everything is moving. No end to it and it'll get worse by day.
But the site has brilliantly captured the thoughts and the little nuances behind agentic coding. It is sure good for all the LLM providers, but on a slightly serious note, it just burns cash which could have been avoided all together.
All said, it's just too good and satirically correct with the prevailing attitude!
Nothing to complain or comment on about the thought process or content. Just don't get into an opinion forming on what is written, but just take a step back and retrospect, it is all on the wall!
Nice work IMHO!
> Websites are broken by default. They used to be functional, fast, and accessible but ugly. Now they're slop, agentic, and on fire — but they get attention, and attention is the only metric left. Nobody's reading and you know it.
I’m upset if an LLM actually wrote this because this is p sick
It's AI. Telling a model to shitpost really isn't very interesting since that's pretty much half of everything on the internets and there was practically infinite training material.
It reads a lot like an LLM... Especially this sentence:
> Now they're slop, agentic, and on fire — but they get attention, and attention is the only metric left.
Welcome to the future, where we have LLMs writing slop rants about LLMs writing slop!
> It reads a lot like an LLM
And that my friend was the joke. Achievement unlocked, congrats!
Did you actually catch my drift though?
Something that reads like an LLM wrote it is different from an LLM having written it to begin with. Something written by an LLM can be something that doesn't have the hallmarks of LLM all over it.
I was just saying that the original quote doesn't strike me as something that's an annoyingly good piece of LLM writing.
There's a lot of experimentation happening on how to get LLMs to write well, starting with half of what's been posted on Gwern's blog as of late.
that's what our ai landlords want. i will give them that, and a few years later i will resell them the cure.
We need this at a conference. Why are people pushing back so heavily when embracing it will bring you greater control over the technologies coming out. Yes AI will replace jobs, what now. Are you just gonna wait you fate or create it. Screw it!
So... you did not read it, or did not understand what you read.
What? What part of my comment says i disagree with what i read. "did i read it, or understand it" did you? you seem lost.
One starts wondering, is farming one of my strengths, is it something else.
As many says if AI does the creative part then I do the dishes, as opposite why we built computers for. Looks like we will be serving AI.
Funny to read this while I'm at the Snowflake summit, where every single vendor booth, keynote talk, and about 95% of tech talks are exclusively about agentic AI. Sometimes I wonder if everyone here is just pretending to like it because they have to, like a tech prostitute telling their investor john that that AI feature is the best they've ever had, it's so good. During Tuesday's keynote, one of the speakers kept getting salty that people weren't really clapping a lot, which was the only amusing part of a slog of a keynote that opened with an AI assisted DJ making "music" that might be fit for phone hold music, if that.
I don't even categorically hate AI. I just wish I could stop fucking hearing about it. These people killed their golden goose (shitty SaaS companies that feed into the giant human centipede of tech stacks that usually just ends up being ad tech at the top) and seem really pumped about it somehow.
I keep hearing about the death of SAAS. How real is it, I wonder?
My company has some products that are SaaS-like, insofar as you are basically just paying us for the ability to use our services, and then some that are less SaaS-like insofar as they consist of paying for ongoing work produced by people with extremely sought after expertise. For potential customers in the first category, I'm starting to see them say, we're deciding between you, company X, company Y, and building it ourselves with AI. It's actually now a concern that any proof of value engagements will involve them just scanning the APIs and workflows to use as references for their LLM agents. Meanwhile our other products are not impacted by this at all and AI just helps them scale workloads.
We might see this die down a bit when people realize that the real reasons you don't just roll it yourself is that (a) you're paying the company to do it right and to be able to use an economy of scale to do it cheaper than you might even be able to yourself and (b) the real cost is not to build it but to maintain it.
Very good. A viable if any longwinded ode to the original. Which in itself is very fitting.
As the owner of https://thebestmotherfucking.website/ - I approve
Omg legend! I’m jealous because without LLMs I wouldn’t have the talent to create a site as good as https://thebestmotherfucking.website/
Thank you for your service sir!
<3
I know. It's very difficult nowadays to build a simple HTML page without throwing 15 frameworks in it
> Keep the dependency tree shallow — mine has a node_modules with its own gravity. Light bends around it.
Love that one. This LLM is fucking funny.
That was a fantastic read
I’m getting some serious Frank Grimes vibes here [1]. I think the slop is causing people to lose their minds because the cognitive dissonance they have seeing it proliferate while hating it so much.
Now Im suspecting if it's possible that VCs are part of the money loop, thus they are more than happy to fund as long as you pour enough of the funding back into the "AI ecosystem".
Someone gotta send a patch to that email lol
I dare you to
No BS. No Fluff.
> Here's how open source contributions go down: I clone your repo, point an agent at your test suite, and have it rewrite the whole thing in Rust to a "spec." No copyright infringed, your honor — an agent wrote every line to a clean-room description, and the description was just your code read aloud. The tests were the spec. The spec was theft. Theft was the pipeline.
I know this website is tongue-and-cheek but I did want to address this part. It's seems to be referring to:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47257803
I personally don't see re-implementing a project's specification from tests as theft. I also find it morally okay as long as the re-implementers don't lie about the original project (e.g. saying it's the clone to theirs, the original is X times slower when it's not, etc.). Legally, it would also be permissible since re-implementation of a spec, and even an api interface, has been established to be fair use:
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/04/05/google-oracle-supre...
I agree with you! It's a shock to the system for a lot of folks to have their code base used that way. FOSS is often a labor of love by very smart folks. If it's legal (and the license allows for it), then it's fair game and hard/impossible to stop.
As a data point, the tests suite were the most precious thing one could have when I was at school. I’m not sure it’s that simple.