Settings

Theme

Vertical Farms Tried to Compete with Open Field Farming. It Isn't Going Well

nytimes.com

19 points by Kaibeezy a month ago · 9 comments

Reader

KaibeezyOP a month ago

https://archive.ph/ABX8U

joegibbs a month ago

“What Gotham Greens can grow in about one acre of our greenhouse we believe would require about 30 acres out in the field” but what's the price of an acre in Brooklyn vs 30 acres in rural Indiana? How do you go up against free sunlight, free water and very cheap land?

  • gus_massa a month ago

    * free sunlight: I agree. This is the main problem. This is the main problem. This is the main problem.

    * free water: There are complicated water right problems (not sure about Indiana), anyway it's more like "under priced cheap water".

    * very cheap land: Cheap land is far away, but transport is not so expensive, so I agree with this too.

2OEH8eoCRo0 a month ago

It's hard to compete with free energy from the sun.

kelseyfrog a month ago

If only there was a way to decrease sunlight supply so we could monetize access to light. It would make vertical farming a much more real option.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection