Settings

Theme

Somebody used spoofed ADSB signals to raster the meme of JD Vance

alecmuffett.com

549 points by wubin 21 days ago · 161 comments · 1 min read

Reader

https://archive.ph/VrEtg

https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=adfdf9&lat=26.678&lon=-...

paulirish 21 days ago

This was not spoofed at the ADS-B layer. It was just spoofed to adsb exchange. (While typically a feeder contributes to multiple sites, this one didn't.) eg:

- https://globe.adsb.fi/?icao=adfdf9&lat=26.678&lon=-80.030&zo...

- https://adsb.lol/?icao=adfdf9&lat=26.678&lon=-80.030&zoom=14...

Relevant discussion on r/adsb: https://www.reddit.com/r/ADSB/comments/1qp3q9n/interesting/ where they note it's also absent on FR24, airplanes.live, and theairtraffic.com.

The adsb-x feeder map: https://map.adsbexchange.com/mlat-map/ They probably won't have a hard time identifying who contributed that data.

  • ryandrake 21 days ago

    Yea, this is more like vandalizing Wikipedia than spoofing or interfering with safety-critical systems. It's juvenile, but probably not crashing any planes. It'll get reverted, and then presumably the adsb exchange website will tighten up their security.

    • PunchyHamster 20 days ago

      There is no security within ADS-B. All you need is directional antenna pointing at receiver (if you just want to fuck with website, not cause mass panic in the nearest airport tower), there is no encryption or other form of authentication in the messages.

      • ryandrake 20 days ago

        The security in question is the ADS-B exchange's web site's security, not the security of the ADS-B system. It's unlikely this vandal even has an antenna.

    • antonvs 20 days ago

      > It's juvenile

      Juvenile times call for juvenile measures. In case you haven’t noticed, the US is being run by a bunch of arrested development high school bullies. Juvenile is one of the only languages they understand.

      • account42 20 days ago

        If anything it juvenile it's "the other guy/team/party did it first".

      • morpheuskafka 20 days ago

        And is Vance or Trump watching Flightradar24 in their free time? And if they did, would they even get mad at this and not find it funny? And if they did get mad at it, would they do anything at all? If they did something, would it be anything desirable or just trying to retaliate at whoever drew this?

      • zombot 20 days ago

        +N. If I could, I would give you multiple upvotes.

  • consumer451 21 days ago

    I had also posted this story earlier, then deleted it once I learned that. However, I did find this interesting doc about real ADS-B spoofing, which does not appear to be very easy:

    https://www.icao.int/sites/default/files/APAC/Meetings/2025/...

    • PunchyHamster 20 days ago

      That just says "you need to go outside, and own an SDR". It's very easy, there is no encryption nor authentication in the system

      • consumer451 20 days ago

        Man, I wrote that comment at the end of a 14hr work day. The crazy thing is that I had seen that SDR slide when I first looked at this. Hours later, when I posted the comment, I reviewed it again and completely hallucinated the SDR slide away.

        I need to check all the work I did towards the end of yesterday. Valuable lesson. Thanks.

jjwiseman 21 days ago

As other commenters noted, this is almost certainly not RF spoofing, just sending bad data to an aggregator (ADS-B Exchange) over the internet.

This instance of spoofing is notable for being the first that I know of that wasn't primitive vector art or text, but a raster image!

In that area of Florida multiple receivers would have picked up actual ADS-B broadcasts. ADS-B aggregators do have various anti-spoofing measures, but they're not impossible to circumvent.

The only case of actual RF spoofing of aircraft transponder signals that I know of was actually done by the U.S. Secret Service, which interfered with passenger jet collision alert systems (TCAS) by apparently broadcasting bogus signals near Ronald Reagan National Airport (KDCA): https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/aviation-flights-whi...

  • jjwiseman 21 days ago

    Just because I don't often get a chance to talk about this, I'll mention that there was a malfunction/accident/bug that caused what you might call spoofed signals to go out around Long Island and New York. Really interesting case where it seems that an FAA system wasn't handling magnetic declination correctly, which led to it generating false TIS-B targets that were rotated 13 degrees from real aircraft positions, from the radar antenna point of view: https://x.com/lemonodor/status/1508505542423064578

    (TIS-B is a system that broadcasts ADS-B-like signals for aircraft that are being tracked by radar but either don't have ADS-B Out or otherwise might not be picked up by other aircraft with ADS-B In, e.g. maybe they're at a low altitude.)

    There have been a couple other incidents with the TIS-B system. E.g. this apparent test near Dallas in 2022 that generated dozens of false targets in an interesting pattern: https://x.com/lemonodor/status/1481712428932997122 There was a similar incident around LAX several months later.

    • andyfowler 21 days ago

      whoa, i saw your initial tweet about this, but never saw your follow up that confirmed the magnetic declination association. the convergence back to the ground radar is brilliant. nice find.

    • jacquesm 21 days ago

      Wow, that would appear to have some potential for bad stuff to happen.

  • Scoundreller 21 days ago

    Notably, the history of this aircraft shows MLAT as the source for all tracking. This spoof is the first ads-b “track” for this plane.

    But there’s so much wrong with the data: 50k ft at 80knots (ground speed!) in a 747.

  • jjwiseman 21 days ago

    (Of course if you were spoofing ADS-B RF signals you wouldn't necessarily need to be anywhere near the spoofed locations. Just like with GPS spoofing.)

    • Nextgrid 21 days ago

      Surely the receiver would run plausibility checks on the received messages and reject spoofed locations that are physically impossible to receive by said receiver?

      • mschuster91 21 days ago

        > spoofed locations that are physically impossible to receive by said receiver?

        Wait until you hear about Sporadic-E or Aurora. RF is a weird place full of natural phenomena making the impossible very possible.

        • Nextgrid 20 days ago

          But even if that was the case, is there any value for a receiver to be receiving those? Surely those messages would be picked up by a receiver closer to the transmitter anyway. I think the value in spoofing rejection is greater than the probability of a transmission reflecting from beyond the horizon and not being already being picked up by a local receiver.

          • mschuster91 20 days ago

            > But even if that was the case, is there any value for a receiver to be receiving those?

            Yes, radio propagation is an entire academic field to be studied :)

            In addition, if you have enough receivers you can use that to run something called MLAT [1] to also pick up GA aircraft that just have a transponder but no GPS. The more the merrier.

            [1] https://adsbx.discourse.group/t/multilateration-mlat-how-it-...

          • jjwiseman 20 days ago

            These receivers mostly don’t have gps and it’s very common for people to put in the wrong coordinates.

  • krferriter 21 days ago

    I agree with this. Hopefully they're able to track down who did this. To upload to ADS-B Exchange you need an account. But it's not that difficult to get one. I'm not sure what kind of information they may be able to get on it. As you say the person who uploaded this may not be anywhere near there. The aggregators probably should have heuristics like if only one feeder in an area with a decent density of feeder coverage uploads an anomalous track, it should get flagged.

    • teiferer 21 days ago

      > Hopefully they're able to track down who did this.

      Why? Was anybody harmed?

      Hopefully they don't find out who did this. There was never any danger, and without this kind of joke, the world would be less fun.

      (Obviously it should be harder to fool critical systems, so this served also as a warning, but if you want to attack such a system, a real bad guy would do this in more subtle ways.)

foota 21 days ago

The FCC and the FAA are two federal agencies that really don't want to mess with, so I hope for their sake they didn't actually spoof it. (.... I wish there were an FBB as well)

  • varenc 21 days ago

    Seems like it wasn't actually spoofed radio signals, but spoofed data collection uploaded to adsbexchange. Still seems unlikely to make the FAA happy, but not as bad. I assume air traffic controllers aren't relying on adsbexchange?

    • jjwiseman 21 days ago

      Maybe not "rely" on, but some definitely use public ADS-B aggregator sites.

      • ryandrake 21 days ago

        I highly doubt any ATC on duty is looking at a public ADS-B aggregator as a real time source of information for his or her job.

        • jjwiseman 21 days ago

          There are non-radar towers that don't have scopes. They may have a traffic display, or maybe not. They might choose to use a public ADS-B aggregator site because it gives them situational awareness, but they don't use it to provide radar services to aircraft. That's my understanding from listening to a lot podcast episodes with air traffic controllers, anyway. I think it's an unofficial, non-FAA approved kind of thing that can make their jobs easier.

          See https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/atc_html... for non-radar ATC procedures.

          • rootusrootus 21 days ago

            > They might choose to use a public ADS-B aggregator site because it gives them situational awareness

            I do not understand what the upside is, aside from saving a tiny amount of effort and cost -- they could get the same data with more reliability by just running their own ADS-B receiver, without having a dependency on a third-party.

            • mschuster91 21 days ago

              > they could get the same data with more reliability by just running their own ADS-B receiver, without having a dependency on a third-party.

              Setting up an ADS-B receiver is indeed very cheap. Less than 100$. That's what many people, both aviation enthusiasts and ham radio operators, do for fun.

              The problem is, do that on an airport? You'll now need permits to install the antenna (needs to be covered in the lightning protection system and even if it's just a passive receiver probably someone needs to sign off on an antenna being added). Fire code means you'll need approval and specialized people to run the cable (you need to drill holes in fire walls). Maybe there's some law or regulation requiring approval or causing a paper trail (e.g. in Germany, all electrical appliances have to be isolation-tested and visually inspected every two years by an electrician). Doing that the proper way is an awful lot of work. And by that point, someone will notice "hey, a Raspberry Pi? An RTL-SDR stick from eBay? No way that is certified to be used in a safety critical environment", killing off the project or requiring a certified device costing orders of magnitude more money.

              In contrast, a privately owned laptop, tablet or phone with the Flightaware app? No one will give a shit about it unless someone relies on FA too much, causes an incident and that is found out.

              • rootusrootus 20 days ago

                All good points. I'd set it up very near the airport but not on it and then access it using the same web browser that I'd use to go to ADSB Exchange.

                • mschuster91 19 days ago

                  > I'd set it up very near the airport but not on it

                  The problem is, you need to have a good height for the antenna - "height is might" in radio, particularly above VHF bands. I actually can see this with my own ADS-B receiver - I'm in a valley and precisely can see that effect when plotting received packets.

                  • rootusrootus 19 days ago

                    I get good distance from my ground level antenna, but while I'm in a valley, it's very wide and long. My assumption is that most airports are going to be in fairly flat areas.

                • jjwiseman 20 days ago

                  Why? You would almost certainly get better data with higher reliability and no effort and no money spent from airplanes.live, adsbexchange.com, etc.

                  • rootusrootus 19 days ago

                    The original point was that you become reliant on a public service, probably run by volunteers, for something halfway critical to your operation. Doing it yourself is easy and then you control the reliability, not someone else.

                    • jjwiseman 16 days ago

                      You're just saying things that don't have basis in reality.

                      It's not something halfway critical to the operation–why would the FAA allow that? ADS-B Exchange is not run by volunteers–it's run by employees of JETNET LLC, an aviation intelligence company. Doing it yourself almost certainly gives you less information–you're not part of a global network of receivers. It almost certainly gives you less reliability–receivers in the big networks typically have a fair amount of overlap which gives redundancy your single receiver doesn't have.

                      It's also not FAA approved!

            • fy20 21 days ago

              I'd assume it's more to see "whats the latest ETA for this aircraft that's scheduled for 1 hour?". Their own ADS-B receiver is unlikely to pick it up.

            • TeMPOraL 20 days ago

              Upside may be just that the equivalent first-party system doesn't exist or performs worse? ATC tower isn't a SCIF, they probably get their real-time news from Twitter like everyone else, too.

            • blitzar 20 days ago

              > they could get the same data

              They could get uncensored data too - you dont want billionaires jets crashing into other planes because they didnt want to be tracked.

              • jjwiseman 20 days ago

                airplanes.live, adsb.lol, ADS-B Exchange, adsb.fi, etc. do not censor the data.

            • jjwiseman 21 days ago

              Imagine your boss doesn’t like you looking at ADS-B sites because it’s not data from an FAA approved system but as long as you’re discreet and not actually breaking a reg they don’t yell at you. Then they come in and see that you installed an antenna, RTL-SDR, and raspberry pi in the tower.

      • b00ty4breakfast 21 days ago

        if there is any critical aviation service using a 3rd party website that relies on volunteer reporting of data, they deserve whatever happens

  • cm2187 21 days ago

    plus they did that right next to an airport

  • cyanydeez 21 days ago

    Depends, how much did DOGE fuck with their leadership and management.

    We now have to both identify obama judges, trump judges and trump bootlickers.

jacquesm 21 days ago

It's still there as of now:

https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=adfdf9&lat=26.678&lon=-...

  • nshireman 21 days ago

    Source:Other

    There it is. Someone running a fake feeder uploaded fake data. No spoofed signals were actually sent over the radio.

    • jacquesm 21 days ago

      I always thought that coverage of those receivers was so dense by now that you'd have multiple reports of each aircraft but apparently that's not the case.

      • nshireman 21 days ago

        There is overlapping coverage, yes, but the server fuses them into one entry.

decimalenough 21 days ago

Unless I'm much mistaken, Vance's face is centered over Mar-a-Lago!

https://maps.app.goo.gl/fjqtAa2qgcWsJvFfA

https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=adfdf9&lat=26.680&lon=-...

  • belter 21 days ago

    If you get the DF17 frames and extract the airborne position messages Type Codes 9–18.

    Then CPR decode them into latitude/longitude....plus plot enough spoofed positions so the point cloud forms a QR code like raster on the map, then scan the rendered pattern...you get a URL to the unredacted Epstein files.

fortran77 21 days ago

Most likely they spoofed the reporting API to "FlightAware" or other ADSB crowd-data-sourced sites and didn't spoof "ADSB Signals"

  • colechristensen 21 days ago

    Actually spoofing ADSB radio signals could very well land you in prison with a $100,000 fine. The FCC is very eager to find and fine you for these kinds of stunts.

    Spamming flightaware is much less severe, but still... it's not cute to mess with life-safety critical infrastructure.

    • fc417fc802 21 days ago

      FlightAware isn't safety critical. If it was then being able to spoof it in this manner would be negligence on the part of the operator.

KnuthIsGod 21 days ago

How long before domestic terrorism charges are laid ?

Everthing seems to be domestic terrorism in the US these days.

  • mindslight 21 days ago

    Domestic terrorism is now an official policy goal of the "US" government, so yes, there is a lot of it.

    • abustamam 20 days ago

      Easy to justify the murder of your political opponents by calling them domestic terrorists.

      What's almost more frightening is how many people actually buy it.

      • mindslight 20 days ago

        I'm still chewing on the idea of how many supporters are bots or at least bot-adjacent (ie manufactured social proof), and what can even be done about that. When I go to my local [small, suburban] protest in a balanced red-blue area, lately it's been many honks and agreements, and only a handful of angry grimaces.

        So I think the tide has long ago shifted, which makes sense what with the terror gangs executing Americans and all. The question is how we can organize into meaningful opposition when most activity happens online these days, and every non-echo-chamber forum still has extremist nutjobs who derail productive conversation.

        I'd think that Congressional offices are seeing a similar dynamic too, inundated with robocalls from "constituents", the occasional untraceable threat of violence to their families if they step out of line, etc.

jjwiseman 20 days ago

It's happening again. Spoofing is in progress, rendering another image. ADS-B Exchange has blocked access to the ICAOs/hexes in question--if you try to look at their history you get redirected to the base map.

https://x.com/TheIntelFrog/status/2016841289556168990

guerrilla 21 days ago

For those wondering, https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/jd-vance-edited-face-photosho...

tanseydavid 20 days ago

Reality is just so @#$%^&* weird these days. Feels like a bad dream.

idontwantthis 21 days ago

Can someone explain what this means? Where would this have been seen?

  • burkaman 21 days ago

    Most planes broadcast their position using ADS-B, and some websites collect these signals and visualize them so you can track flight paths. Somebody broadcast a fake flight path that draws a picture of JD Vance on these sites: https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=adfdf9&lat=26.678&lon=-...

    • zeeZ 21 days ago

      To expand on that, those websites mostly operate on random volunteers self hosting a (starting price) fairly cheap receiver and antenna with an open source stack that feeds the ADS-B data to the website operator in exchange for nothing or free "premium" benefits.

      The spoofer could have just sent them fake location information drawing an image using latitude, longitude and altitude for color (in the default view flight paths have different colors based on the altitude of the plane at that point in time).

      They could have built an antenna and actually broadcast this data, but that would be a lot more effort and most likely some form of crime.

      • dpe82 21 days ago

        As a pilot I really hope it's the former. Broadcasting spoofed traffic at minimum would be confusing and distracting to both pilots and ATC.

    • JasonADrury 21 days ago

      > Somebody broadcast a fake flight path

      They didn't actually "broadcast" anything. This was created by uploading fake data to absexchange.

    • HNisCIS 21 days ago

      No, someone probably setup a fake feeder pretending to be an ADSB receiver.

  • OkayPhysicist 21 days ago

    ADS-B (Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast) is a protocol for planes to publish their positions, so help with the whole "not crashing into each other" thing. The data is mostly for pilots and air traffic control, but it is publicly available, and there's a number of sites that track the data so that you can see what planes are overhead or whatever.

    Someone spoofed Airforce One's transponder, had it declare itself as "VANCE 1", and then fly a pattern to display the meme. Or lied to one or more of the major sites, pretending to be listening in on the ADS-B signals. It's unclear. Regardless, it's a very funny hack.

    • cluckindan 21 days ago

      It’s basically the modern radar system as in it supplies the data air traffic controllers see on their screens. Civilian ATC doesn’t really use actual radars any more.

      That said, TCAS (Traffic Collision Avoidance System) does not operate on flight data reported by ADS-B.

  • esseph 21 days ago

    Pilots and nerds that watch airplane traffic

    Viewable on FlightRadar24, etc

  • JasonADrury 21 days ago

    > Where would this have been seen?

    on HN, mostly

eep_social 21 days ago

edit: op also has this, disregard

hugged but someone caught it: https://archive.is/VrEtg

burnt-resistor 21 days ago

Since most of these ADS-B collection sites are patchworks of unofficial/best effort, that seems like a great attack vector for nation state-level spoofing to interrupt flight planning, capacity planning, other tertiary air transport operations, and make civilians nervous. It's analogous to "hobby" code running key infrastructure of the internet without serious processes and auditing, testing, and verification.

It would be far better and more reliable to have the FAA do it by providing authoritative single source of truth as (selectively) open data rather than depend upon the whims / greed / sloppiness of an over-privatized utility. ATCs need and/or have this data anyhow, so in the future, it should be provided.

How do less neoliberal European countries do it?

  • habinero 20 days ago

    These are hobbyist sites, not critical infrastructure. Commercial aviation doesn't use them.

    > It's analogous to "hobby" code running key infrastructure of the internet

    I have some bad news my dude lol

aa_is_op 21 days ago

Isn't this actually illegal?

  • altairprime 21 days ago

    It’s not “illegal broadcast which engages the FAA and FCC to hunt you down” illegal, but that doesn’t exclude other prosecutions.

    • filleduchaos 20 days ago

      Other persecutions for what? Sending crap data to an API is not a crime.

      • altairprime 20 days ago

        It's literally "computer fraud and abuse" in every sense of the word, so one assumes that an avenue of potential prosecution and possible conviction would be under the CFAA act. This does not, of course, guarantee that a conviction would be made and upheld at appeal, but this community is quite familiar with the dire harm that federal prosecution for misuse of computer services can impose on individuals, no matter how misguided that prosecution may be. Prosecution can be wielded as a form of persecution that does not require a conviction as outcome to be successful, and that is the a pressing risk now faced by whoever did this.

dayyan 21 days ago

Hilarious

andrewstuart 21 days ago

Please explain the tech.

  • sneak 21 days ago

    ADS-B is packet data telemetry broadcast unencrypted and unauthenticated by aircraft on 1090MHz.

    Anyone can receive it, and many do. FlightRadar and others have networks of people with receivers that forward all received packets to central servers.

    The aircraft self-report location, heading, altitude, etc, so anyone can transmit packets making ghost planes.

    I am somewhat surprised nobody has stashed an ADS-B spoofer near ATL or AMS that just broadcasts tracks of A380 tail numbers crossing the runways perpendicular at 500 ft AGL or something. They have primary radar, sure, but I imagine there would still be a temporary disruption until people figured out what was going on.

    I think this is the first case I’ve seen of ADS-B spoofing in the wild.

    EDIT: this was spoofed reports to the data aggregators via the internet, not broadcast on radio waves. I’ve still never seen or heard tell of RF ADS-B spoofing.

    • fc417fc802 21 days ago

      > I’ve still never seen or heard tell of RF ADS-B spoofing.

      Probably because the required expertise, effort, risk, and reward ratios don't work out. You can cause a minor disturbance that isn't particularly visible and in exchange get investigated by the FBI. Seems about as wise as attempting to graffiti the front gate of a military base.

    • pixl97 21 days ago

      Fake signals are not uncommon, but mostly accidental. They are dealt with very quickly when causing traffic control problems

      • sneak 21 days ago

        Sure, but traffic control problems can still be caused (temporarily) by abuse of the frequency/protocol by those intending to cause disruption.

        Can you tell me more about the fake signals? Who sends them? Why? How often?

      • mywittyname 21 days ago

        I'm guessing this doesn't cause traffic control problems due to the no-fly zone over that area?

        • pixl97 21 days ago

          Probably is not causing traffic issues. With that said I'm sure a number of TLA's are looking into it already, so whoever did it has hopefully took a number of infosec steps not to get caught and questioned.

    • infthi 20 days ago

      There was this proof of concept in 2012: https://youtu.be/CXv1j3GbgLk?t=2483

      (IIUC they did not actually transmit data, just fed it directly into an ADS-B receiver, but transmitting would've been trivial at this point)

  • CGMthrowaway 21 days ago

    No real 747 flew this. It was a prank using impossible flight data via ADS-B spoofing. Ground-based “software-defined radios” (SDRs) broadcast fake transponder signals to trick ADS-B Exchange. This works because both the ADS-B & AIS systems use unencrypted, unauthenticated data.

    • joecool1029 21 days ago

      It was sent to ADSBexchange's API, not over RF. No laws were broken.

      • nshireman 21 days ago

        Yep, as evidenced by the "Source:Other" tag on ADSBExchange. Signals actually sent over the air would show ADS-B, TIS-B, etc, as the data source.

        • Scoundreller 21 days ago

          It’s only “other” at the very last point. Go earlier in the track and it shows as “ADS-B”, but every historical real flight in this plane is MLAT (it doesn’t broadcast its precise position but it can be inferred from receivers)

        • jjwiseman 21 days ago

          That's not true. And if you click almost anywhere else on the spoofed track it will show as Source: ADS-B.

burnt-resistor 21 days ago

This is just yet another cost and side-effect of a deeply unpopular, business-destroying, corrupt regime.

sammy2255 21 days ago

This has gotta be some sort of federal crime

  • pear01 21 days ago

    I believe this was "spoofed" only in the sense that a particular provider/online platform accepted data via an API that was abused to draw this on that platform only. Searching around it seems it was not found if you looked on other platforms, so it might not even have been a crime. I believe they didn't emit any real "signals" just took advantage of an API that should probably be better secured.

    • observationist 21 days ago

      At worst it'd be a violation of the site ToS - it's a crowdsourced community data based system, and not any sort of an official, important system. The account doesn't seem to have been banned, so maybe the admins are just rolling with the joke.

    • fc417fc802 21 days ago

      > an API that should probably be better secured.

      I think the API is secured? The entire premise is that a volunteer creates an account and uploads ADS-B telemetry. Detecting falsified data is a separate matter.

  • Scoundreller 21 days ago

    Doubt it did anything in RF, only sent packets to adsbexchange’s web service that its volunteers feed it.

    Also Adsbexchange has had some… history:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/ADSB/comments/10l2euc/adsb_exchange...

    https://hackaday.com/2023/01/26/ads-b-exchange-sells-up-cont...

  • HNisCIS 21 days ago

    ADSB sites aren't any sort of official thing. You can send whatever data you want to them. Just because it's there doesn't mean it ever went over the air as an ADSB broadcast.

  • lovecg 21 days ago

    Agreed with other commenters that nothing was likely actually broadcast, but if it was it would definitely be highly illegal and you’d have feds knocking down your door pretty quickly. They don’t joke around with illegal transmissions like that.

  • advisedwang 21 days ago

    It's almost certainly a violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act because it's an extremely broad law.

    • eleventyseven 21 days ago

      Violating terms and conditions is not a CFAA violation, per the Supreme Court case Van Buren v US (https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/03/supreme-court-cyber...) which narrowed to actual fraud and data theft.

      "The Government’s interpretation of the statute would attach criminal penalties to a breathtaking amount of commonplace computer activity,” Barrett wrote. “If the ‘exceeds authorized access’ clause criminalizes every violation of a computer-use policy, then millions of otherwise law-abiding citizens are criminals."

      adsbexchange is a user-generated content platform where you can submit decoded radio signals to a common database. Sending fake data to adsbexchange is as much a CFAA violation as posting hoaxes to Wikipedia or a social media platform.

      • kevin_thibedeau 21 days ago

        Precedent won't get in the way of a tribal retaliation. They've proven that they can't be consistent with fundamental laws they've sworn to uphold.

    • sophacles 21 days ago

      TBF so is your reply and mine.

  • TimorousBestie 21 days ago

    An interesting question.

    Assuming the FAA has the authority to enforce ADSB requirements (an open question post-Chevron), I can’t find any regulation saying non-aircrafts cannot transmit ADSB. Only ones saying aircrafts in certain categories must.

    There’s probably some non-interference requirement somewhere (FCC spectrum licensing perhaps), but I’m not seeing it immediately.

    All this is in the hypothetical that RF was transmitted, which as others point out it probably wasn’t.

    • tjohns 21 days ago

      It would be under the FCC regs, not the FAA regs.

      Whatever transmitter you're using would not be type-accepted for operation on the 1080 MHz or 978 MHz band. (47 USC § 301)

      Additionally, RF operation with the intent of willful interference is inherently illegal. (47 USC § 333)

    • 15155 21 days ago

      (Assuming this were actually RF)

      This is easily-prosecutable willful interference or possibly aircraft sabotage: ADS-B operates in licensed bands and uses an already highly-contended modulation scheme and transmission protocol.

      • esseph 21 days ago

        No reason to believe RF when you can just upload whatever data you want

      • fragmede 21 days ago

        They'll probably try and make a case of wire fraud and CFAA as the usual go tos if it wasn't in RF.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection