Correction: Anthropic attack did not have 1000/s requests
anthropic.comGiven they made a geopolitical accusations and dozens of mainstream publications repeated the "thousands of requests per second", this seems like a grossly negligent flub that should not be dismissed as a mere typo.
I frequently, alone, do 1000s of requests over a period of time, especially ones that are mostly cache hits, which can be $10-$50 in API costs.
This was not a "large scale" attack by any means.
Claude checked the post for accuracy before publishing, "trust the process" /s
[dupe] Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45918638
To increase the quality of productive discussion, have you considered posting new information on the previous threads, instead of dropping a drive-by [dupe] comment and leaving?
At the time of writing this comment, nobody has noticed or discussed Anthropic's correction to the PR puff piece on the original submission.
Do your part and help make HN a more informed audience!
ChrisArchitect is a significant contributor to HN through these dupe comments (I wonder if it is an automation)
If you want to inform HN, write a short post about it with some thoughts and submit that.
Submitting the an article with a different title is generally faux pas here, exceptions are occasional