Settings

Theme

BGP zombies and excessive path hunting

blog.cloudflare.com

49 points by emot 2 months ago · 9 comments

Reader

pm2222 2 months ago

I thought the bigger /32 prefix should be advertised from AS64511 to both AS13335 and AS64510.

Is there free BGP peering for the purpose of only passing on the NLRIs?

It's interesting that on the "open positions" page, the location filter appears to be strictly string matching, e.g. "US" does not cover "New York, US"

  • toast0 a month ago

    I don't think it makes sense for AS64511 (example customer) to advertise the /32 to AS13335 (Cloudflare) when they only want the /48 to be routed through Cloudflare.

    • pm2222 a month ago

      /32 is not gonna matter when /48 is present. When /48 is not present, why wouldn’t /32 be advertised?

      • toast0 a month ago

        The /32 is going to matter for the addresses outside the /48. The customer only wants one /48 to go through Cloudflare; from the article context, probably because that /48 is under DDoS. DDoS scrubbing services are expensive in dollars and latency (and sometimes network features), so you only want to expose your traffic to that when necessary. When the DDoS is over, you don't want any of your traffic going through Cloudflare, so you withdraw the /48, you wouldn't want to advertise the /32 through Cloudflare at that point either.

        Using the article's example ranges:

        If the customer's IP 2001:db8::1 is being DDoSed, then they advertise 2001:db8::/48 through cloudflare, but 2001:db8:1::1 doesn't want that; it'll be handled by their 2001:db8::/32 announcement on their usual ISP(s)

        • pm2222 a month ago

          You are right I missed the DDoS part and that cf is not a typical uplink in this use case.

  • pm2222 a month ago

    Interesting that this comment was added 9 days ago all of a sudden it pops up now with a 3hour stamp.

great_wubwub a month ago

> Things get more interesting when AS64510 signals for 2001:db8::/48 to be withdrawn by Cloudflare (AS13335)

Typo - shouldn't that be AS64511?

...and...

> The MRAI specifies the minimum amount of time ... between each BGP advertisement update.

Each update _per prefix, per peer_. RFC4271 sec.9.2.1.1 says

--- [MRAI] determines the minimum amount of time that must elapse between an advertisement and/or withdrawal of routes to a particular destination by a BGP speaker to a peer ---

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection