'Dangerous design choices' trapped teens in Cybertruck crash, lawsuit claims
oaklandside.orgBasic aspects of auto design, safety and functionality have been refined by over a century of real world experience and testing.
Changes should be considered and evaluated very carefully, particularly where user safety is concerned.
Tesla has failed to do this and has boldly "fixed" some things that didn't need fixing in my opinion.
An obvious example is door latches. Exiting the vehicle under duress should be as intuitive as possible without written instructions. Expecting passengers to read the manual beforehand is simply absurd and indicative of a basic design failure.
Another is moving basic driving feedback info (like speed and range) out of the driver's typical line of sight.
But one of the most egregious is mis-labeling driver assistance as "Full Self Driving" which even they admit is purely aspirational at this point.
Will Tesla robots be labeled "Sentient" when they clearly are not?
current "design" of motor viehicles has nothing to do with function and saftey, and is bieng driven by sales teams looking for "features" to sell, and sell again through subscriptions, screens that are exclusivly distractions, and the most basic and essential requirements lost like getting in and out, where now it is clear that this is bieng activly interfered with, as it is a major "interactive moment" not to be lost or sqandered without forecing user engagement
Swiss cheese model of accident cause:
Hole #1 grandpa lets teenage grandson take cybertruck out for a night with friends
Hole #2 kid driver gets rip-roaring drunk
Hole #3 other kids get in the car with drunk driver
Hole #4 drunk kid drives cybertruck into a concrete wall
Hole #5 Tesla makes manual door releases hard to find.
All those thing lined up for those kids. Any one of them could have been a point where doing something different prevents this outcome.
So yes. Manual door releases are hard to find in an emergency, trapping occupants so they die unnecessarily in burning vehicles.
Perhaps we should all acknowledge that part out loud and prioritize making the manual release easy to find when you’re clawing desperately at the door as you burn to death.
Surely with all that computing power you could have some sort of fire detector that forcibly opens the doors and disables the locking mechanism.
Actually I see little reason why unlocking doors and holding them unlocked should not be mandatory in crash. On average that must be the preferable outcome.
And coincidentally, only one of those is industrially mass produced warranting avoidance and remediation. Even if younglings being younglings, we shouldn't be making deathtrap vehicles optimized for incinerating occupants.
Yeah I think it's a stupid design and it should not be permitted. There should always be an obvious and fairly standard way to open a car door from the inside.
But we have those rear seat "child safety" locks that could have had the same effect.
And you can't always prevent someone from doing something fatally stupid.
No you can't always prevent stupidity. But you can lessen the chances of any given stupidity necessarily being fatal.
Musk probably forgot that on a regular car, electric windows do not have a backup method to roll down, so whether or not this option is selected by a buyer, the primary door opening mechanism for everyday use has always been mechanical for a reason.
Then whether or not you select the additional option of electric door locks, the mechanical everyday handles remain the primary way each driver or passenger gets in and out most of the time.
So that type of familiarity could always be taken for granted, if someone has gotten in and out at least once, they have historically almost always been familiar with the mechanical handles to an extent just doing so.
And these type of victims had probably never had a chance to have even routinely gotten out of a Cybertruck for their first time, since the vehicle itself is still not very common.
For that reason the mechanical handles need to be not just the primary method of egress, but more prominent than average to make up the difference. Especially from the inside, and like the best-established motor companies have done, the electric locks are "simply" an augmented version of the underlying mechanical ones which remain in place and functional not just for nostalgic reasons.
Automatic windows and electric locks go together in ways that you really have to think about if you're going to match those who started decades earlier. Maybe that's why so many copied each other except for rare situations like this.
Musk should probably be sentenced to exclusively drive a current generation Cybertruck (software too) for at least 30 years.
Good thing the vehicle is basically illegal in Europe.
2, 3 and 4 are very highly correlated, doesn't really fit the Swiss cheese model.