iPhone 5 – Learn marketing from today's most popular landing page
blog.kickofflabs.comI'm not a marketing guy, so I have no idea what I'm talking about here, but shouldn't a call to action include an action? Something like (again, not a marketing guy): get yours today! If the iPhone 5 banner is considered a call to action by marketing people, the term doesn't seem that useful.
Complete bullshit. If Apple had put a shady HTML form it would have been the same. People in the east cost put their alarm clock at 3am, I don't think the design of the page made them change their decision
There's a reason they started putting their alarm clocks on; they were pulled in with marketing like this.
I think they were more pulled in by brand cachet than they were by this marketing specifically.
I think they were more pulled in my wanting the best phone out there as early as possible.
How can you make that statement with a straight face without realizing that you're purchasing pure marketing at this point?
Nobody's used it, reviewed it, torn it down, or broken it in yet. You're stating that it's "the best phone out there" purely on the value of the brand.
(That's not to say that it won't be, but I hope to point out that saying "it's the best phone out there" is ridiculous when there is literally no way to know that except for the marketing that has been done around it.)
I don't buy that. I agree it doesn't have to be that good, but you still have to execute on basics... which is what the post is trying to highlight.
Wouldn't they have sold out no matter what? I mean all they have to do is produce less devices than they have orders. It's not as if you can buy one today, or can you?
So wait one day, get 10 million orders or whatever, call Foxconn and order 9.9 million devices. Bingo, another headline for Apple.
Apple being sold out is not great, it's a failure of their supply chain. If Apple could, they would never be sold out (but they also would want to never have any stock). They want to make money after all. They certainly do not need to appease investors by lying about the demand they are getting.
(Though I maybe should add that the iPhone being initially sold out might be an inevitable failure of the supply chain. It’s not like you can switch production on just like that and churn out new phones at full speed. There is some ramp-up. Add to that some pent-up demand, and iPhones being sold out quickly might be inevitable – though that does at least indicate that the new phone likely is no dud, beyond that there isn’t much information in that.)
More headlines = more marketing = more iPhones sold.
Being (temporarily) sold out just adds to the mystique of any device. Remember, people want what they can't have. Also think of the herd mentality - if millions of people are buying this, it must be good!
I don't think it is ever Apple's strategy to sell out, but there are reasons that this is good (as well as bad, like you say).
That's baloney. No marketing gain is wort it not being able to actually sell something, at lest if tons of people are crazy about what you are selling.
Yours is just a batshit insane conspiracy theory.
You're correct of course. Just folks projecting their irrational Apple hate. Naturally, no company wants to sell out of their product. Of course, no one considers that it's impossible to make an infinite number of iPhones - parts and production capacity are the limiting factor.
But why stop to think for a second when you can fire off some nonsense.
Great post and detailed analysis Josh.
Thomas - While the design/layout/marketing elements may not have had an effect on the loyal zealots setting their alarm clocks early, it certain did help convince those who were on the fence about the upgrade 9not saying it's right - I'm an Android/Linux user myself and will never buy into the heard mentality - but it keep making Apple money.
The key lesson here is what elements works well and how you can reapply them to other industries and products.
Thanks for understanding the point of the post is to educate folks on how they could learn from best practices. They still had to execute on their marketing. If you compare their landing pages to the Samsung, Microsoft, or Nokia ones... it's no comparison.
This was a great examination. Thanks for this.
"Visually the link is below, but the entire section and image is a link."
The only thing that will accomplish is inadvertent clicks. Are you going to sell something as expensive as an iPhone because of an inadvertent click?
I get quite annoyed if I click somewhere to gain focus or something and is taken to another page because of it. I can't imagine it doing any good and cherry picking it as good design seems quite convoluted.
Mom and pop don't like hunting for links. Watch normal people browse the web. They try to click on anything they think will give them more information about what they want.
Yeah I watch them all the time. Nothing breaks their trust as much as an action they never even thought they initiated -> they barely dare to touch anything.
Nope - this page could have been a MySpace or GeoCities page and they'd still have sold out.
That's awesome. I'm going to have to use that tool more often. :)
Amazing how a couple of words in a headline can affect the discussion on the article. Read it as "Good analysis of Apple's iPhone 5 website marketing." Yes, they would have still sold out on day one if they'd had a page with just a "Buy Now" button, an "Under Construction" gif, and a "Netscape Now!" badge, but these marketing pages will be up for a year or so.
If there was ever a case for the Mods editing a post title it is this. The linked to article makes no claims about this page being the reason it sold out in an hour. But people are less likely to click on a link titled "iPhone 5 – Learn marketing from todays most popular landing page".
Everyone tests different titles. It's part of marketing.
I'll freely admit to:
1. Writing a best practices post on a timely subject to grab more attention. "How to create a good landing page" wouldn't do nearly as well.
2. Testing headlines to see what drives the most clicks. Although this one was my first try on Hacker News.
I'll bet over the next 6 months Apple changes the headlines on their landing pages as well.
Maybe just my opinion, but I don't think HN submissions should be used to test which headlines get more clicks. (Wouldn't that pretty much fall into the "Link Bait" bucket?) The HN Guidelines[1] has some pretty clear, simple text on submission titles. It mostly boils down to "use the original title... unless a few of the mentioned cases exist".
I wasn't clear: I'm not bothered by the headline, just by the comments being entirely dominated by discussion about it. Not that I'm helping. :) Thanks for the article!
You guys commenting seem to hate or be frustrated about online marketing.