Settings

Theme

Jack Daniel's says Canada pulling US alcohol off shelves 'worse than tariff'

reuters.com

30 points by awestley 10 months ago · 36 comments

Reader

jfengel 10 months ago

You think that's disproportionate? Imposing a tariff in response to nothing at all is disproportionate.

On a percentage basis, it's merely a finite response to an infinite action. That doesn't seem unfair to me.

Don't expect your enemy to play by your rules when you're the one who made them an enemy.

  • tfandango 10 months ago

    Remember we are imposing the tariffs on an emergency basis because of fentanyl crossing the border. Even though everyone, even our mastermind president can't even play along with his own rouse; saying things like he wants manufacturing to move to the US or Canada becoming state 51 to avoid tariffs. There are no more rules anymore.

    • rich_sasha 10 months ago

      Tru dat. When Canada gloriously becomes the 51st, hell, maybe even 52nd state, there will be no fentanyl smuggling, or any other smuggling, across the border. Because no border. Genius!

    • _zetk 10 months ago

      [flagged]

      • ZeroGravitas 10 months ago

        The legal justification is the story about the border. From an explainer article:

        > Part of the reason Trump could impose the tariffs so quickly is because the White House is invoking a sweeping national security law to justify the new levies.

        > Until now, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, IEEPA, had been used mainly to impose emergency sanctions on foreign dictators or suspected terrorist groups.

        > But the Trump administration argues that the illicit global fentanyl trade and immigrants at the Mexican border both qualify as "unusual and extraordinary" foreign threats to American national security, justifying Trump's use of emergency powers under IEEPA.

      • tfandango 10 months ago

        Yes, this is what I was saying.

  • quickslowdown 10 months ago

    I'd be curious how much Jack Daniels has donated to their own demise.

flr03 10 months ago

I'm not canadian, but my understanding is that this is beyond just the tariff. It is in addition of the general attitude and (lack of) diplomacy from the US government towards Canada for the past few weeks.

  • philipov 10 months ago

    White House Press Secretary said the quiet part loud when she announced that Canada can stop this tariff business by agreeing to become the 51st state.

    • glonq 10 months ago

      Nine Canadian provinces have larger populations than Wyoming, so add nine extra states and the US has got a deal ... that it will probably regret lol.

      • jrs235 10 months ago

        Which would most likely lead to blue Congress and Executive, which is why they will first play shenanigans to ensure no more elections like we have known them.

  • JKCalhoun 10 months ago

    And Canada would do best to hold strong until this US presidential term is up.

Karawebnetwork 10 months ago

This is an important part of the article: "Canada accounted for only 1% of the company's total sales, Whiting said, so the company can withstand the hit."

threatofrain 10 months ago

If you're going to play the trade war game for equal damages then neither side should play. Trade wars should be about disproportionate damage until the other side quits.

cranky908canuck 10 months ago

Big laugh, JD site is refusing to accept feedback from canadian IP's, or at least making doing so very difficult.

_zetk 10 months ago

[flagged]

josefritzishere 10 months ago

Trump is doing to pretty signifigant short-term damage to the US economy.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection