Settings

Theme

Judge orders hearing to review Onion's purchase of Alex Jones's InfoWars

theguardian.com

23 points by SamWhited a year ago · 9 comments

Reader

smeeger a year ago

aaaand this will never make it to the front page and HN is yet again guilty of misleading people by rocketing pro-left narratives to the top of the front page while letting the corresponding retractions and corrections wallow in obscurity!

  • PhasmaFelis a year ago

    It's on the front page right now.

    This is a really weird thing to get paranoid about. Alex Jones was no exemplar of conservative values, for all that he repeated some conservative talking points.

jfengel a year ago

If Musk wants to pay even more money than The Onion and the Sandy Hook families, fine. The Sandy Hook families will get the money.

Though I don't know how you conduct a fair auction now that two key bidders' bids have been revealed.

  • linuxftw a year ago

    > The exact bid amount offered by the Onion for InfoWars remains unknown, but it has been reported it was lower than First United American’s bid of $3.5m.

    Sounds a lot like FUA won the auction, but the trustee is playing games. The judge ordered a public auction, the trustee and the creditors don't get to side-step the judge's order because some of them might perceive their actions to be a better outcome.

    • JumpCrisscross a year ago

      > but the trustee is playing games

      Not really. Trustee’s obligation is to the creditors. Some of the creditors agreed to release their claims if it went to a third party. That has monetary value.

      • linuxftw a year ago

        Doesn't matter, that's not what the judge had ordered. Trustees don't decide anything, the judge has the final say.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection