Settings

Theme

Missiles in a Shipping Container

tapaghosh.substack.com

4 points by deepnotderp 2 years ago · 4 comments

Reader

JumpCrisscross 2 years ago

> Instead of using tiny rocket thrusters (eg cold gas or hydrazine thrusters

Hydrazine is toxic [1], auto ignites at “24°C on a rusty iron surface” [2] and burns at over 2,000°F [3].

Cold gas or copter are better, though I’d personally consider springs with explosive bolts.

[1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK592403/

[2] https://www.inchem.org/documents/icsc/icsc/eics0281.htm

[3] https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19680015493/downloads/19...

JoeyBananas 2 years ago

Whoever wrote this blog post seems so incredibly incompetent that they could easily be a senior engineer at Lockheed Martin

seo-speedwagon 2 years ago

Tilt beds for shipping containers already exist. Just fire it out the front? Or just use a winch?

  • JumpCrisscross 2 years ago

    > fire it out the front?

    You’d need blast shields for the remaining missiles. And this restricts use to fields with basically airfield clearance ahead. That makes the launcher vulnerable to detection and counter-battery fire.

    > just use a winch?

    Slow, expensive and takes up space.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection