Settings

Theme

Framework: A new RISC-V Mainboard from DeepComputing

frame.work

63 points by felixdorn · 13 comments

Reader

4 threads
pbronez

Dupe of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40718124

lovedaddy

Well just pre-ordered the 120hz amd. If the RiscV drops in, I'm going to be very impressed.

pbronez

Pretty cool! This is significant because it’s Framework’s first 3rd party mainboard AND their first non-x86 mainboard.

Interesting that they’ve added RISC-V before ARM. Wonder if anyone’s working on that. There are so many ARM SBC designs out there, you’d think it would be straightforward (though obviously not trivial) to adapt one of those designs to the Framework mainboard format.

  • geocrasher

    Framework didn't do anything. They're just announcing what somebody else did, which was to make a motherboard that has a RISC-V processor in it, which fit a Framework laptop.

    • bee_rider

      Building an ecosystem where this could just happen without their direct involvement isn’t nothing, and it is cool to see this proof of the concept.

      • geocrasher

        You are correct. I should have said that Framework didn't build the board. They made its creation in that form factor possible.

    • gorkish

      > Framework didn't do anything.

      I get your point, but there's simply no way this happened in a vacuum, at least not in this case. IMO it is far more important to acknowledge the things that Framework /did do/ in support of this project, even if a lot of that work simply came from properly publishing design specs, mechanical drawings, and other documentation. It's very encouraging to see Framework actively support and promote the 3rd party ecosystem around their products, designs, and specs.

westurner

What is the battery life like; maybe in ops/kwhr? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40719630

  • brucehoult

    The JH7110 CPU and 8 GB RAM on e.g. the VisionFive 2 uses about 5W of power at full load.

    Battery life is going to be determined by your screen brightness, not the CPU.

    • westurner

      From the reddit link in my this flgged (?) comment:

      > About three years ago, I came across information that the RISC-V U74 core had roughly 1.8 times lower performance per clock compared to the ARM Cortex-A53.

      Are there other advantages?

      What is the immediate marginal cost of an ARM license per core(s)?

      • snvzz

        Likely to do with such information being unsourced, and contradicting every documented benchmark.

        U74 does very easily outdo A53 in performance, power and area.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection