Settings

Theme

Anthropic Designed Itself to Avoid OpenAI's Mistakes

time.com

45 points by davidQ123 2 years ago · 9 comments

Reader

dpflan 2 years ago

Are we seeing a similar phenomenon here with autonomous vehicles, for example Waymo has had a steadier approach it seems than others: while, for example Cruise seems like it didn’t.

dmitrygr 2 years ago

OpenAI was also designed to avoid those mistakes, until people started seeing dollar signs. I am not sure that laws can be made to outlaw human nature (greed being an inalienable part of it). And even if they were, I am not sure they could be adequately enforced.

JohnBrookz 2 years ago

Here’s a paradoxical take. If you build an AI you want it to be super intelligent and take power away from humanity. Why would you want humans to have power over something more intelligent and powerful than us, that’s called a weapon.

flembat 2 years ago

The concept of a public benefit company seems really useful to society, it would be good if that could be strengthened in law and became more widespread. Since having a pure duty to maximise profit for shareholders is not that easy to reconcile with ethical behaviour.

tivert 2 years ago

> Paul Christiano, Dario Amodei, and Geoffrey Irving write equations on a whiteboard at OpenAI, the artificial intelligence lab founded by Elon Musk, in San Francisco, July 10, 2017.

Can someone explain the architecture in that photo? It shows two pretty heavy wooden pillars each literally right next to another much larger steel I-beam pillar. I don't get it. It seems like the wooden pillars would be totally redundant, and it looks kinda dumb having them so close.

  • Lerc 2 years ago

    Perhaps as a potential mounting point? Much easier to hammer nails into wood than steel. Wouldn't really explain why they are so hefty though.

    It could be that some rewelding was needed on the steel and they wanted additional support while that happened.

    Feng shui?

  • temblor 2 years ago

    The answer is hiding in the caption: the I-beam is earthquake retrofitting. The wooden beams are original. (Huge I-beams cross and/or frame many indoor spaces in SF at odd/surprising angles -- a consistent visual signature.)

    • tivert 2 years ago

      That makes sense, thanks!

      Though I'm surprised they kept the wood beams. They would look cool on their own, but they look stupid right next to the I-beams.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection