Settings

Theme

Supreme Court rejects appeal by Elon Musk's X on disclosing federal surveillance

cnbc.com

19 points by barbacoa 2 years ago · 19 comments

Reader

atticora 2 years ago

Thanks for trying, X.

  ... argued that the federal government’s prohibition on the company disclosing the exact number of receipts of national security-related requests for surveillance of users was unconstitutional, and should be granted only in exceptional cases
It seems wrong to prevent reporting not just of the particulars of the surveillance but on the scale of it as well. It hides important perspective from the voters more than it protects national security. Or perhaps it's an attempt to protect the security apparatus from the voters.
JohnnyHerz 2 years ago

And the argument that disclosing the "number of requests made" should be a state secret is...? Oh right, it would expose the plenitude of the misbehavior by our government.

thetopher 2 years ago

I wonder what would happen if they published a list of all their users who are not currently under surveillance, or gave them a nice little icon. I feel like somebody tried this before, but my Google searches are coming up empty.

  • entropicgravity 2 years ago

    Yes, the canary in the coal mine technique. As far as I know it's not illegal, but you only get a count of '1'.

zeroCalories 2 years ago

Will Musk release all of his dirty laundry dealing with our enemies?

  • JohnnyHerz 2 years ago

    Hey Friend. This topic is not about Musk. Start a new thread if you want to go down that rabbit hole.

    This is about our government and it's abuse of power.

    • zeroCalories 2 years ago

      Yes it is, it's about Musk's attempt to undermine our country by playing interference for our enemies.

      • fsflover 2 years ago

        Fighting corruption of the government doesn't undermine the country. Hiding it does.

        • zeroCalories 2 years ago

          There is nothing corrupt about lawfully obtaining information on people. Musk framing this as corruption is an attempt to flame conspiracy theories. If not, I hope he will release all of his dealings with all international organizations.

          • fsflover 2 years ago

            There is nothing lawful about mass surveillance of Americans by the government. It's explicitly against the Constitution.

            • zeroCalories 2 years ago

              Musk should just leak the requests if he thinks it's so indefensible. But he won't, because he has nothing. Just secrets that he's legally obligated to keep. Looking forward to Musk leaking the communication with Russia and China, because clearly his goal is to fight authoritarianism, not undermine the U.S.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection