Gerhard Behles and Robert Henke on Ableton (2016)
roberthenke.comIt's been a pleasure to work at Ableton and to be at Loop. Gerhard as a co-founder always had an open ear, and the company deeply cared about its employees. And Robert provided valuable guidance from an artistic perspective.
I think the way Ableton works is responsible for a good part of Live's success: Treat people with respect, as something valuable and unique, and they will create an awesome product. There's a lot of attention to detail, a lot of dedication towards the artists that use Live every day. I mean, in the end, Live should not only enable very different people to create their own unique sound and music, but also work reliably, on stage, in real time, on a desktop OS. There isn't much talk about that, but DAWs are pretty complex, tightly coupled pieces of software, due to those requirements. There's a lot of unsung heroes.
Anyway, I'm grateful for all the lovely people I met at Ableton, for what I learnt, on a technical and social level, and the trust that was put into me, by giving me quite a free hand over a few subsystems of the software.
It's really nice (as a very long term user - and lover! - of Ableton) to hear that they're a great company as well as a company that makes great software. This makes me happy. Thanks for posting :-)
I like how Ableton brought a breath of fresh air into traditional DAWs. If you use Reaper, but want it to be more like Ableton there is Playtime[1]. From what I understand it is currently rewritten in Rust with a new release expected in 2024.
Interesting, thanks for posting. I was looking for something similar although aimed primarily at drum patterns programming and later arranging them into a song, not unlike the older drum machines allowed, but more modern with visual representation of patterns as objects on screen and the ability to create variations just by cloning them for example by drag&drop then applying the needed changes, then link them together. This could be also used live, possibly creating different paths according to MIDI signals from external devices (pads? - pedalboard?) for example to choose to continue a song for a few more bars, or a different ending, a song variation based on the audience mood, etc.
Great interview.
They also have been very good at marketing.
When I was looking for a DAW a couple of years ago, the sheer amount of helpful content and tutorials stood out, both from the company and the community they built. I also like their creator-focused events (Loop) and the one-thing series which reminds me to try something new.
Does anyone have recommendations for a DAW that's more for jamming - playing along to a song, or making stuff up on top of on a premade drum loop & bass line?
I found that most DAWs seem to be aimed at music creation instead. Camelot is close, but it can't take in a drum loop.
Disclaimer: I haven't tried (or put in effort into learning) many DAWs.
You'll never believe what this article is about :-)
You might want to look at https://www.irealpro.com/ and Band in a Box ( https://www.pgmusic.com/ ).
Ableton Live!
in 2019 bought a serious amount of hardware. As an FL user - i tried to make it work in FL - it was a miserable experience. FF to a few months ago - bought an RME AES midi card - connect my physical synths to it....grab an ableton demo - fire up ableton - and with an extra piece of magic - the Novation Launchpad MK3 - im jamming, looping, combining patterns - all screen free...its the best of "dawless" and computer music production i've ever experienced.
I get the whole Live fanboying. It's really great for open ended production - and perfectly suites the fluidity and separation of "audio finger painting" - and "song finishing".
I have many gripes about it - which both FL and Reaper address - but i highly recommend it as a DAW for people who want to "play"/"bash stuff out".
Live user here. Fantastic interview.
While Live certainly isn't perfect and there are other DAWs out there that are quite feature-rich and offer a different & interesting workflow, I keep coming back to Live as my main DAW. It's just so versatile. Keep up the great work, Ableton!
What's your view on Bitwig? Created by ex Ableton folks.
It's funny, because I went full Bitwig after being dissatisfied with the lack of certain workflow features in Ableton Live (for example, no customisable shortcuts, crappy bounce workflow etc.)
...and while I loved Bitwig, and while Bitwig is vastly superior on a technical and workflow level, I had this epiphany about music making: It should be about making music.
It's not about having shortcuts or having better ways of doing things. The problem is that I ended up spending more time customising Bitwig and playing around with all the cool things it could do, that it kind of took the focus away from actually making music.
Basically, I'm the kind of person that likes to tinker and that's a huge distraction for me. I think what makes Ableton Live so valuable to me, is that there is no tinker.
It's the fact that it is so bare-bones in a lot of ways, that makes it work for me and allows me to focus on making music.
That's one of the reasons I think FL is a great DAW, because there's no session mode, only an arrangement mode. You're forced to compose rather than loop endlessly or muck about tweaking parameters.
I think Live is geared to "do whatever you want, quickly" as opposed to Bitwig being "make any sort of noise you can imagine" or FL "write whatever you want, quickly".
All great tools, just depends on what you'd like to do, honestly. Nothing is inherently bad.
I had the opposite experience with FL Studio.
I think the problem is that there's too many different ways to do the same thing in FL Studio, whereas Ableton Live keeps it pretty simple in terms of workflow.
There's no session mode, but you get that sequencer instead. But to be fair, I never used session mode in Ableton, only arrangement.
But at the end of the day, DAWs are so personal. Everyone has a different preference for something different.
I've toyed around with it a few times. I like it! It's definitely a cool product, and I think with its focus on modularity it blurs the line between a traditional DAW focused on production/composition and a more experimental DAW focused on sound design, as opposed to Live's focus on blurring the line between a DAW focused on live performance and a DAW focused on composition/production.
I'm not one who is focused on a DAW's particular weaknesses, rather, what makes each one unique from a functionality point of view.
I love Live, but that doesn't mean I hate FL Studio, Reason, Logic, Bitwig, VCV Rack, etc... In fact, as someone who spends more time in the DAW doing crazy and experimental sound design versus actual song production (blame my ADHD for that!), I enjoy some of the unique features of all the major DAWs.
Thanks for clarifying ;)
Do you have a bandcamp or similar where you post your sound design experiments?
I wish I had enough complete projects to actually put up on SC or Bandcamp or whatever.
I have close to a thousand uncompleted Live projects sitting on my current laptop and old laptop, some are just little melodic loops, some are fully built out EDM/house/techno/electronic loops, some are just whatever happened when opening Ableton after a night of substance abuse (read: completely unorganized, unmixed, heavily distorted sonic chaos).
I can't arrange for shit, even though it's easy and straightforward. This is the one part of Live I don't like - you can just noodle around in clip view if you'd like, and unlike FL, Logic, Pro Tools, you aren't arranging from the start.
What I really enjoy doing is just being unfamiliar with a new plugin or piece of equipment and just noodling around with it creating happy accidents. Presets are cool if you want to just make music and not learn the plugin.
I would love if it there was a HN thread for DAW geeks with regular meetups or Zoom chats so we could all show off what little nuggets of production we've learned. There are so many things in Live that I don't use or even know exists (or how to use) that I wish someone could just show me, or vice versa.
Useful reminder that even if all you can see is differences, you probably have a lot of commonalities with others:
> So from the moment you met, did you know you wanted to work together and make music?
> GB: No! We hated each other!
> RH: We came from a very different background and, actually it’s a good question because later we figured out we have a lot of things in common. But on first sight we only saw the differences.
> RH: To paint a totally cliche picture, I was at that time the kind of totally lost goth punk person. And Gerhard pretty much looked the same as he did now [...] nice white scarf and a very stable demeanor. Like the type of people I hated at school.
> RH: Right after noticing that the other was there too, we ran up the auditorium to the exit and said: “What the fuck are you doing here?” And well the next thing you do is you decide you need to have some coffee to discuss that problem.
> Ok, so that’s basically where everything stems from. You became friends through mutual hatred of each other, and how did that become music? Like were you making electronic music already?
> RH: Yes.
And then they both went on to collaborate and create one of the most popular DAWs out there :)
A software meet-cute!
Never liked Live despite trying to get into it a few times. I prefer the Reaper/FL Studio combo.
Live user for around 15 years here. Looking forward to getting 12!