Sam Altman, Sugarcoating the Apocalypse
nytimes.comMost forward looking decisions are probabilistic and require irreversible expenditure of resources with real risk of failure. Intelligence doesn’t solve that limitation, real or artificial.
Neverending doom loop of
One more step Please complete the security check to access archive.is
no matter how many times I click the box or answer the bus/traffic lights questions. On starlink
It's a Maureen Dowd piece, if that helps you decide whether or not to drop it.
Don't worry, I skimmed it and it mostly looks like clickbait anyway with no real substance worth noting.
It's an opinion piece, not sure about clickbait.
I'd summarize it as - "Sam Altman is an optimist about his ability to lead a for-profit entity and balance that w/ the original OpenAI mission of democratically advancing AI w/ safety in mind. Maureen Dowd thinks that a leader who is great at wooing investors, techies, and lawmakers, and increasingly is downplaying near-term AI risk, is a dangerous choice given the risks expressed by other AI experts."
i'd consider anything from nytimes and cnbnews clickbait trash that probably shouldn't make its way to HN
"Democracy dies in darkness." Even their slogan is doom and gloom. "If you don't buy our product, democracy will die."
I think that's the Washington Post.
Archive.today actively sabotages requests from CloudFlare / Quad9 users. Please avoid linking them.
This site hasnt worked for me for 2+ months. Stuck on captcha.