Settings

Theme

LED lights found to kill coronavirus: Global first in fight against Covid-19

aftau.org

6 points by karolkozub 5 years ago · 7 comments

Reader

dave_4_bagels 5 years ago

This is awesome! However, unfortunately a single legitimate (many "uv led" devices on amazon are fake!) 285nm UVC led is between $7-21 USD [0].

0 - https://www.digikey.com/en/products/filter/infrared-uv-visib...

  • raxxorrax 5 years ago

    One should be aware that these wavelengths might not be particularly healthy for your skin and can result in sunburns without causing the usual red skin symptoms. You should also not look into the light source and wear special glasses if you handle UV light.

    • LinuxBender 5 years ago

      Agreed. Safer would be 222nm UVC as it can't penetrate the outer layer of the eye. This is what medical facilities actually use. Unfortunately no LED's exist that can emit in this range at a useful output power. This is still limited to excimer lamps. There are LEDs in this range, but they can't emit high enough output to break down genetic material.

      • raxxorrax 5 years ago

        There are some devices with mercury vapor lamps for applications that require a broader spectrum. True though that LED have mostly just one peak and then open up in visible wavelengths again.

        Theoretically it should be safe, but I would still use glasses, since even outer layers of your eye are probably photosensitive, not only your retina.

        But yes, UVA specifically is dangerous for skin too, since it travels deeper without causing sunburn symptoms but still damaging the tissue, so a shorter wavelength might even be preferable.

        • dave_4_bagels 5 years ago

          The problem with mercury vapor lamps with a broader spectrum is that they produce ozone gas. I've observed this first hand with a philips UV bulb I purchased. Even though this lamp supposedly has a "doping" agent to help block unwanted wavelengths that produce ozone.

    • dave_4_bagels 5 years ago

      Yeah, far UVC is great for the exact reason that it's far less harmful to human skin. However, "far uvc" (207-222nm) leds are even more expensive. Many far uvc devices aren't available to general consumers (to control demand). The units that are available to the general population are incredibly expensive, at least $2k for a lamp large enough for use in a small bedroom.

      https://www.ushio.com/product/care222-filtered-far-uv-c-exci...

wolfretcrap 5 years ago

how about capturing UV light from sun and using it instead of led lights

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection