Show HN: Video/Audio Calling over 1KM for Off-Grid and Remote Areas
hackaday.comWiFi is an ubiquitous feature of the modern landscape, but due to power restrictions on most hardware alongside the high-frequency signal it’s typically fairly limited in range. This of course leads to frustration where a WiFi signal can be seen, but the connection is unreliable or slow. While most would reach for a range extender or other hardware bridge, [tak786] was able to roll out a better solution for his workplace by using a high-gain antenna and a single-board computer which gets him an amazing kilometer-wide WiFi network.
The build uses a 10 dBi antenna from TP-Link that’s rated for outdoor use and a single-board computer which acts as a sort of router. The antenna is placed at the top of a building which certainly helps with the extreme range as well. This setup doesn’t actually broadcast an open Internet connection, though. [tak786]’s employer needed a teleconferencing solution for their building, and he also created a fully open-source video conferencing solution called trango that can run on any LAN and doesn’t require an Internet connection. The WiFi setup in this build is effectively just a bonus to make the conferencing system more effective.
[tak786] is planning on releasing a whitepaper about this build shortly, but for now you can access the source code for the video conferencing system at his GitHub page. And, before anyone jumps to conclusions, apparently this is well within FCC rules as well. Some of the comments in the linked Reddit post suggest that with an amateur radio license this system could be pushed much further, too. If you need more range than a kilometer, though, it’s not too much more difficult to do once you have all the right hardware.
I like this, mostly for the OS LAN Video conferencing system. The only one that comes to mind is VideoLAN VC but it seems to be deprecated since 2007.
The wireless part is really just wifi with big antennas. I'm sure you could get much more than 1km with dishes on both sides of the link - I've done 30km file transfers and Mumble chats that were still Part 15 FCC compliant.
Yes. We could have. But that would be point to point. We have done point to multipoint (thats why its called a hotspot). We had villages and remote areas in mind.