Settings

Theme

GNU tar blocking factor, blocks, records and checkpoints

finch.am

27 points by mfincham · 5 comments

Reader

2 threads
throw0101a

> Because tar operations may be long running, it can be useful to have feedback about progress during the operation.

For those running on a system that has SIGINFO (e.g., BSD, macOS?), hit ^T and you'll get a status report to stderr. ^T should work for various other utilities as well: dd, cp, ftp.

On those systems that do not have SIGINFO (Linux?), but are using bsdtar (libarchive), SIGUSR1 will do the same:

* https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/search?q=SIGINFO

INFO isn't one of the mandatory POSIX signals:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signal_(IPC)#POSIX_signals

  • LukeShu

    I'm a GNU fanboy, but I've given in that (libarchive) bsdtar is just nicer than GNU tar

kevin_thibedeau

Tar is a convenient format for basic embedded data storage since it's easy to parse and you don't have to build custom tooling to prepare them. We'd store small pre-gzipped web resources in a tar file and send them out as is without needing onboard compression. The blocking factor puzzled me for a bit when I was trying to store a few hundred bytes and couldn't understand where the extra 10k was coming from. Sometimes you have to RTFM.

  • bestouff

    I wrote an incomplete tar parser (genext2fs author here) because I also thought tar was easy. Believe me nothing could be more wrong. That old underspecified file format is full of weird addons by different implementations, bug workarounds, it's big and hard to get right.

    Eventually I gave in and added libarchive as an alternative.

    • kevin_thibedeau

      If you stick to the modern format it's simple. If you are only using modern tooling there's no need to support the legacy headers.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection