Don't waste your time by cd-ing in the terminal
huyng.comDon't waste your time bookmarking directories, jump right to them ;) https://github.com/rupa/z
`z` tracks your most used directories. After a short learning phase, it will take you to the directory, based on its usage frequency and a hint you give it on the command line. Say I am often cd'ing into /var/www - then after a while I can just type `z ww`.
I love projects like this. They so elegantly show what using the right tool for the job can do for you, in terms of code simplicity and conciseness. Doing this in, say, Perl or Python or Ruby, would be entirely possible, and folks who code exclusively in those languages might assume it would be easier in a "more powerful" language...but Bash has so many nice little built-ins that make it really concise and portable. One file, no modules, and it does exactly what it's supposed to do.
I think it's illustrative that the developer went through a Python-based version on the path to building z.
I want to be able to preview the path or directory name that z will navigate to. Something like the way the webkit developer console autocompletes an object, method, or property in light gray color. Or it could be displayed in the terminal title bar. Is that possible?
z is great. I don't know how I lived without it.
It's become so ingrained in my fingers that whenever I switch to a new shell it's the first thing I port over:
I remember seeing this, but forgot entirely to use it. Have been spending a while looking for it again, or something equivalent. Thanks.
I forgot the url, too. But then I remembered the tagline "z is the new j" - which is enough for google to bring up the repo - even without quotes.
I've created an AUR package for this script, found here: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=46675
Out of the box only with `z -l foo` # list all dirs matching foo (by frequency)
I like this workflow better:
1. Go to the directory in question
2. Type "save nm" where "nm" is any short name for the directory, like "blog" or "blg"
3. From now on, type "cd nm" whenever you want to go there.
No session restart required, even.
I copied the code that enables this workflow from http://dotfiles.org/~jacqui/.bashrc (or was it https://gist.github.com/117528)
The idea is discussed here: http://hints.macworld.com/article.php?story=2002071600512379...
Or in zsh:
setopt cdablevars nm=/path/to/whatever cd nmyou can put this in ~/.zshrc for persistent zsh bookmarks
touch ~/.zshmarks && source ~/.zshmarks function b() { echo "hash -d $1=\"`pwd`\"" >> ~/.zshmarks && source ~/.zshmarks }or you could just put some paths on your cdpath and enable autocd.
and then you just cd by typing ~bookmark
in Bash, change the first line to:
shopt -s cdable_varsin Bash you don't even need to do that, just do:
foo=/etc/ cd $foo
Dollars to donuts the author is a Vimmer. I am and the workflow makes complete sense to me :-)
Why not just:
There's no need for magic when you know how to shell.echo "export nm=`pwd`/blog"' >> ~/.profile . ~/.profile cd $nmWhy not just
No need for hacks when you know how to shell.shopt -s cdable_vars nm=`pwd`/blog cd nmAnnoying special cases:
Inflexible:$ cd / $ nm=/foo $ ls | grep nm $ cd nm $ pwd /foo $ cd ~ $ ls | grep nm nm $ cd nm $ pwd ~/nm $ echo FFFFFUUUUUUUUU
Worse, It's nonstandard and only saves you one chracter.$ cd nm/jan/img cd: No such director nm/jan/img $ echo SHIT SHIT $ cd $nm/jan/img
Hey Guys,
This is my blog.
FWIW, I've actually switched away from using the script mentioned in the link posted by OP and have moved towards using an improved version below.
http://www.huyng.com/bashmarks-directory-bookmarks-for-the-s...
This new version has 3 commands:
- "s" for save current directory as a bookmark
- "g" for jump to bookmark's directory
- "l" for list all bookmarks.I first was excited by title "Don't waste your time by cd-ing in the terminal", but then it just turned out to be a blog post about making cd'ing quicker. If you want to boost your productivity, my advice is to stop cd'ing altogether.
I see a lot of people -- particularly vi users -- cd'ing back and forth through a large directory tree. I usually tell them to get a terminal emulator that lets you easily manage many terminals open. Open one per directory you want to operate in, for instance. Learn how to switch back and forth between the different shells.
But most importantly, don't quit the program to switch back and forth between directories and files. Learn to use your editor of choice properly: how to view directory listings, how to switch back and forth, etc. Vim can do this just fine btw. The choice of tool here doesn't matter so much. Just pick one and learn it. This applies to your choice of terminal emulator, shell, editor, etc.
Open one per directory you want to operate in, for instance.
This is a common source of headache when using the terminal as an IDE. Not only is it easy to get lost in a sea of terminal-tabs, but it's also quite cumbersome to restore the state of 5+ tabs after a shutdown or disconnect. Even more so when GNU screen enters the mix.
What I'd really like to have is a terminal that can attach to a remote GNU screen and display the screen-windows as local tabs.
So browsing graphical tabs is quicker for you then using "Ctrl+RightArrow" or "Ctrl+n" or some variation of one of those? Traversing my screen or tmux sessions is usually much faster than using a mouse.
Traversing is not the issue here, it's more about having an ad-hoc way to watch things side-by-side by dragging a tab to a window and vice versa, and about having a proper scrollback.
Yes, screen, tmux and vim have split window modes, but those are cumbersome to operate (and I'm saying that as a year-long ion3 user) and the scrollback issue has not been addressed by either up to this day.
Or, to put it more generally: Terminals are sadly stuck firmly in the 1970s. There has been near zero innovation beyond emulating them in tabbed windows and setting xterm titles. Heck, we're moving backwards. OSX ships with a terminal that doesn't even support 256 colors. ZModem is unheard of except in fairly exotic/old emulators such as Zoc. Support for "advanced" terminal features (double-size fonts, graphics mode) is rare.
I spend >8hrs/day inside a terminal. I would happily pay a 3 digit license fee for a modern terminal emulator that adds the features I mentioned and innovates beyond. There's infinite room for innovation by leveraging special ESC-sequences (server tells terminal what to do), drag & drop, integrating with tools like screen, ssh or even building new CLI tools that interface with the terminal in a smart way...
I want vim to tell my terminal to display NerdTree in a native side-car widget like TextMate. I want an "open" CLI-command that downloads the target-file from the remote server and displays it locally without me having to futz with scp. I want to drag & drop files onto the server that I'm currently ssh'd into. I want the term to maintain my entire session (including all tabs and remote connections) across reboots. And, yes, I'd like to have my remote screen windows line up neatly as native tabs.
>I want an "open" CLI-command that downloads the target-file from the remote server and displays it locally without me having to futz with scp. I want to drag & drop files onto the server that I'm currently ssh'd into.
You can get this by editing files over sshfs.
In general though, I find that sort of persistence to be somewhat unstable. I'd rather know that everything I have done is documented and backed up than just sitting in some sort of dump of memory.
You can get this by editing files over sshfs.
Been there, it's a kludge and tends to not cope well with network disconnects. Also when sshfs flakes out then it has a habit of leaving you with 0-byte files.
Also note this doesn't fully address the problem. I literally want to drag/drop into the current directory of whatever server I'm ssh'd into (possibly with multiple ssh-hops in between).
This has been possible in the 80's, it's called ZModem. The server-side part is still in your favorite linux distribution (lrzsz). Sadly the client-side support has disappeared from almost all terminal emulators (Afaik only Zoc still supports it).
With Zoc you can just drop a file and it will send the ZModem init-string, which conveniently launches the 'rz' binary on the server. Likewise you can say 'sz file', Zoc will detect the init-string and open a download-dialog.
Forgotten technologies... not all of them were bad.
I've also been frustrated by these issues. I want to be able to edit a file with local typing speed (i.e., gvim on Windows), but then be able to hit a key and be in a terminal window on that server in that folder to perhaps do a manual grep or rebuild an index or whatever. I feel like we were closer in the 90s with innovative products like Slirp and Term and, yes, Zmodem (and Kermit).
I started trying to build out something like this based on vim's netrw stuff but it never really worked out. I'm not even sure if what I want is part of vim or if it's some nebulous other tool.
Sounds like you want Emacs' tramp. On your local emacs, open a file in the form "/user@remote-ssh-host:file" and it will grab the remote file and edit it locally. Crazily all the emacs version control commands and stuff like M-x compile and M-x grep all work in the remote context. Very cool stuff.
Obviously this requires that you use Emacs instead of Vim though. Don't be afraid though, the grass is pretty green over here :-).
No need to switch to an inferior editor. ;-)
Vim has this functionality built right in: http://vimdoc.sourceforge.net/htmldoc/pi_netrw.html#netrw
However, as said above, for me Tramp/netrw are kludges that tend to add more problems than they solve. A real solution can't be constrained to a particular editor.
In my experience, tramp was even more reliable than sshfs. Both need work before they are truly effective solutions.
Though the latency of my satellite connection outweighs the shortcomings of sshfs. The thing about tramp is that where sshfs hangs up directory listing and file loading, tramp regularly hangs up the editor. (And tramp should really turn off autosave by default.)
Also, pushd and popd. And "cd -". And ctrl-Z and fg to jump out of your editor for a moment. And dragging dirs from the Finder (or whatever) to the terminal.
And use tools that are aware of directories: tar -C, NERDtree for Vim, zsh globbing.
a terminal emulator which has a session sasving feature built in to restore terminal tabs with their working directories is: termit find it on github. lua scripting api included :)
Why is a home-rolled cd script interesting when there are many more mature, feature-rich cd-tools out there?
* http://www.skamphausen.de/cgi-bin/ska/CDargs
* http://github.com/joelthelion/autojump
* http://github.com/flavio/jump
Also, the title is misleading. I thought it was actually a commandline tool that removed the need to cd most of the time, like lightning: http://tagaholic.me/2010/04/08/lightning-speed-for-your-shel...
Ditto, this one feels like reinventing the wheel when we have the tools you named.
Yet another time saver: if you need to execute only a single command in another directory, use:
(cd /path; command)
I prefer (cd /path && command), since that way if the cd fails for some reason (like you've typo'd the path), it won't still attempt to run the command.
Of course! I actually do always use double-ampersand for chaining commands in bash, not sure what made me use a semicolon in that example. Thanks for the correction, a small but important distinction.
Appending ";cd -" on the end will have the same effect.
There's also the pushd and popd commands which are part of bash already.
And there's a wikipedia entry for this even: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pushd_and_popd
You can also use the "dirs" command (I think part of bash as well) that tells you the state of the stack. If you set the -v option, you can get the depth of different directories, and you can just do pushd +N to jump to the specific directory.
funny- I don't see man pages (nor info pages) for pushd, popd, or dirs. What am I missing about the documentation?
They're shell built-ins, so use "man bash" to read about them.
To only display information about a specific command, you can also use
help <command>Awesome. Thanks.
No mention of ZSH directory stacks yet? http://www.acm.uiuc.edu/workshops/zsh/dir_stack.html
Some helpful aliases to manage them:
alias 1='cd -1'
alias 2='cd -2'
alias 3='cd -3'
alias 4='cd -4'
alias 5='cd -5'
alias 6='cd -6'
alias 7='cd -7'
alias d='dirs -v'
alias h='history'
alias j='jobs'
Just one of the many reasons to use ZSH.
Just one of the many reasons to use ZSH.
What shell doesn't have a directory stack?
What's the bash equivalent to zsh's "setopt autopushd"?
I don't know what that is, but does it do more than alias cd='pushd'?
That's essentially what it does, but if you use the "autocd" option as well, you don't need to type "cd" - you can just use the name of a directory as a command. So, "autopushd" would ensure that these operations use the directory stack also.
sh
I have bound 'pushd -1' to PgUp.
Ditto for "pushd +0" and PgDn.function directory_up { pushd -1 zle reset-prompt } zle -N directory-up directory_up bindkey "\e[5~" directory-upHow about `setopt cdablevars`?
setopt cdablevars proj=$HOME/Projects cd proj pwd # => /Users/sjs/Projectsnice stuff. You got your dotfiles on a github?
I know you didn't ask me, but you might find something you like here: https://github.com/samsonjs/config (dot files) and https://github.com/samsonjs/bin
appreciated, thanks!
Try autojump, I love it - https://github.com/joelthelion/autojump/wiki
Just to help sell it some more: autojump basically watches where you cd and builds a model (of some sort) that guesses where you want to go based on a few characters.
For instance, I have a project called "structured-prediction" deep in some folder hierarchy, and I can just type "j stru" or "j pred" or even "j uct" and it goes to the directory.
The best part is that it figures this out automatically. You don't have to remember to bookmark anything.
I use this tool all day, everyday. It should be built into bash.
Agreed, autojump seems far more principled too than the method described in OP.
Autojump is my vote as well
I also prefer autojump.
I've also wondered to myself why there isn't a terminal program with a directory tree by the side so you could just click on the directory that you want to be in, instead of ls -cd-tab-blah-^H-tab-^M. It would also a have a list of favorite and most-recently-used directories.
A weekend project, perhaps...
Also don't forget to turn on the "lynx like navigation" option. This lets you navigate all the way through arrow keys (no need to use Enter).
Because clicking a mouse takes you away from the keyboard .. a context switch if you like, which added up over time slow you down when you have work to do.
Perhaps, but it'd be less of a context switch than remembering what directory I'm in and where it was that I wanted to go. It may be that I'm growing old and dull, but I'm better at clicking on things than remembering them.
Unrelated but a nice alias "tree".
alias tree="find . -name .svn -prune -o -name .DS_Store -prune -o -name .git -prune -o -print | sed -e 's;[^/]*/;|___;g;s;___|; |;g'"
It shows your directory listing in the form of a tree. Easier to visualize.
Or, you could just use "tree":
Nice little hack!
Gorgeous!
Because that would require a mouse, and that would require an X server, etc...
Works fine in vim with NERDTree without a mouse.
GPM?
I use Dolphin sometimes for this reason, so that I can navigate the directory tree/places via mouse but use the console pane as normal.
Krusader also has a built in console pane.
Not strictly a terminal as the console is running over KDE over X, ..., but works for me.
There is dolphin, and a few others. http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/3990/is-there-a-good...
Maybe not as quick .. but `ctrl+r cd` gets me there quick enough and I don't have to remember what numeric shortcut is assigned to which directory.
Will give it a shot however, good effort.
Another time saver is to have a function that calls ls after cd'ing:
c(){ cd "$@" && ls;}
Silly me. I almost always do the same, but never thought of creating a function. Thanks anyways. :D
Another built-in worth knowing about is CDPATH.[1] I find that setting a sane CDPATH and bash-completion makes cd-ing anywhere I go regularly pretty trivial - just a few letters and a few TABs and I'm good to go.
I'd be extremely careful with CDPATH, never use this on an important host.
Having "cd foo" potentially take you to an entirely different location can be dangerous, to say the least.
I'm not sure I follow. There's nothing dangerous about cd-ing to a directory, though of course it could be dangerous to start work in 'foo', thinking it was 'bar'. Most people use a prompt, or the title bar of their shell to protect against that. But either way, I'm not sure how CDPATH makes that danger greater than any other trick that allows you to jump quickly to a directory using a bookmark, popd or the like.
Removing predictability from the 'cd' command is not a good idea. If you want a smart 'cd' then just call it 'j' or something else. Easier to type, too.cd foo rm -f *Certainly a possible scenario, but anyone who cds into any directory (by whatever means) and enters 'rm -f *' without first checking contents deserves what they get.
Well, this was just the most graphic example, there are more subtle ways to create a mess. Directory names are far from unique, a misfiring 'cd tmp' or 'cd src' can easily lead to nasty surprises, even without 'rm' ever getting involved at all.
And you do know that CDPATH also affects shell scripts, right?
> Directory names are far from unique, a misfiring 'cd tmp' or 'cd src' can easily lead to nasty surprises, even without 'rm' ever getting involved at all.
I hear what you're saying, though I'm not really persuaded by this argument. When you 'cd' into a directory along your CDPATH, Bash will print out where you end up when you arrive. Here's an example of what I mean (easier to see than explain):
The regular cd simply takes me where I asked. When I cd and use CDPATH (in the second case), I get told where I end up. Sure, there might be four or five different 'ithaca' folders on various machines and even on one machine, but I think that extra print-out really makes it unlikely that I will get confused.circe ~ ❯❯ cd bin circe bin ❯❯ cd ithaca /Users/circe/code/ithaca circe ithaca [master•] ❯❯> And you do know that CDPATH also affects shell scripts, right?
No, I'm embarrassed to say, I never thought of this. And this part does sound like a potential problem. When I write Bash scripts, I always use full paths, but I see where my having CDPATH set puts me at danger from other people's scripts. Technomancy gives a concrete example above. Although I think this is bad practice on their part (not to use full paths), I appreciate the warning.
Does it implicitly export $CDPATH? Otherwise you would have to 'export CDPATH' to have that happen.
No, it does not. But in today's world of layered environments (virtualenv, rvm) your bashrc may very well be sourced in places that you didn't anticipate. On top of that each linux distribution has its own way of screwing with the environment files in creative ways, as anyone can attest who has had to make a cronjob work across platforms...
However, your question suggests that you're probably one of the chosen few who could actually use this feature safely. My general advice against it was aimed at the 99% other people who think "Oh convenient!" without being fully aware of the implications.
The link I posted to suggests exporting CDPATH. I've always copied that, without really thinking about the effect on scripts. If you set (but don't export) CDPATH, it does not get passed along to scripts, as far as I can tell here.
So, no, Bash doesn't implicitly export the variable. (Thanks to everyone for helping me improve my dotfiles a little bit.)
There are also a lot of scripts that assume CDPATH isn't being used; for instance any hadoop-based project will break if it's set.
I use this function in my bash profile to navigate to my projects from anywhere on the file system.
function to {
cd ~/Sites/$1/
}
$ to coenhyde.com
I would suggest mapping an alias instead of creating a function so that you will still be able to take advantage of parameter completion:
> alias to='cd ~/Sites/'
Ah, much nicer. Thankyou.
Edit: On testing it doesn't work. 'to sitename' just goes straight to ~/Sites/. I knew there must have been a reason i used a function instead of an alias.
Oh, that's right. 'to sitename' becomes 'cd ~/Sites/ sitename' which is not what you want. My apologies.
alias ba='vim ~/.bash_aliases; source ~/.bash_aliases'
A bookmarking system seems like overkill to solve this problem.
Thank you for this awesome little script. However I found out that bashmarks doesn't work with folders which have whitespaces in the name.
For example:
cd /Users/username/Library/Application\ Support
s app_support
g app_support
Here are changes I made:
# save current directory to bookmarks
touch ~/.sdirs
function s {
cat ~/.sdirs | grep -v "export DIR_$1=" > ~/.sdirs1
mv ~/.sdirs1 ~/.sdirs
escaped_path=${PWD/ /\\ }
echo "export DIR_$1=$escaped_path" >> ~/.sdirs
}
# jump to bookmark
function g {
source ~/.sdirs
path=$(eval $(echo echo $(echo \$DIR_$1)))
# replace whitespaces with "\ " for escaping
escaped_path=${path/ /\\ }
cd_eval="cd $escaped_path"
eval $cd_eval
}
Edit: I opened up a fork and commited all my changes to this repo. I also opened a pull request and I hope my fix will get accepted.
GitHub fork: https://github.com/Oemera/bashmarks
Thanks
Ömer
I was just at the point of making a bunch of aliases for some long paths, to save my tab key from daily abuse. This is way more elegant. Thanks.
Maybe it's just because I run a lot of the same commands and don't do a lot of development from the terminal, but I avoid cding at all usually and just type the full path. It svaes time over multiple sessions thanks to ctrl+r, and the commands in my history work no matter what dir I'm in.
Ctrl-r is what I use too. Usually requires fewer keystrokes than other methods discussed here. And it works for all commands in shell history.
A nice idea... I may end up using it, though a lot of my folders are the same name and I do like deterministic behavior.
In the meantime, this kicks the pants off separate Finder + Terminal action: http://decimus.net/DTerm/
Interesting reading this because this is exactly why I love emacs, especially when I came across this tip a while ago: "Emacs: TRAMP + bookmarks = awesome", http://marc-abramowitz.com/archives/2006/03/12/emacs-tramp-b...
I'm always plugged in to my server with tramp and I've got multiple projects all bookmarked. It makes hopping around real easy, makes it feel like a browser more than an editor.
I use the following scripts, both by Petar Marinov, they've saved me an enormous amount of keystrokes. One replaces CTRL-R history search, the other makes a much friendlier replacement for pushd and popd.
http://geocities.com/h2428/petar/bash_acd.htm
http://geocities.com/h2428/petar/bash_hist.htm
highly recommended.
1. How about we just learning to type fast(-er) and use file name completion
2. Use real shell like ksh, where history search actually works
3. cd $OLDPWD is occasionally helpful. Occasionally.
Kids...
Exactly. OP is doing gymnastics to solve a non-problem.
Is 'cd $OLDPWD' any different from 'cd -' ?
I have usually a few dirs that i go back and forth frequently when coding, and I simply set them to my env. I add the following line to ~/.bashrc export lib='/path/to/my/lib' And 'cd $lib' will take me there. Very simple, and caters for most of my cd needs. Don't over-complicate things
Back in 2009 I described another version of this here: http://www.commandlinefu.com/commands/view/117/fast-access-t...
I use "m1=`pwd`" and then "cd $m1" for example. No setup required, although admittedly slightly more typing and the need to quote directories with spaces in them (rare for Unix sysadmin tasks for which I'm using a shell in the first place).
I manage with a combination of pushd/popd, cd - and terminal tabs most of the time.
If you're a programmer, you may find Qwandry useful: github.com/adamsanderson/qwandry
Instead of trying to remember where all your libraries are located, it will just open them up for you. Great for trying to debug misbehaving code.
Additionally, try typing fewer characters when you cd in the general case: https://github.com/philc/fuzzycd
I've been using this for a few years and it's been a joy.
I use textexpander to keep from cd'ing everywhere... Just stick in a text expander snippet for directories I use a lot...
ie: hwst - cd /usr/Brad/Desktop/Dropbox/Brad/howas.it/repos/howasit_alpha/ etc...
The suggestion about putting "mdump" in .bash_logout, to automatically save all your bookmarks on exiting shell, is really useful.
I like this: https://github.com/MarcWeber/path-selector
I cant remember my bookmarks so CTRL + R, then searching in history most of a time
Why not just use symlinks for your bookmarks? pushd and popd are also useful.
I got bitten with symlinks for bookmarks. They don't change the PWD to the correct one. For example:
which will break scripts.cd /home/nick ln -s /var/www www cd www echo $PWD ---> /home/nick/www
i wont