Peter Thiel Wants to Inject Himself with Young People's Blood
vanityfair.comThere are dozens of medications made from human blood, which are used to treat everything from infections to hemophilia. No one thinks anything about it (not to mention all the people who get whole blood transfusions for surgery or trauma).
This is just a hit piece that's been generated because Thiel has recently been declared an Enemy of the State.
Peter Thiel has expressed public support for, and invested in, numerous life-extension technologies such as human growth hormone and cryogenics. I doubt either Vanity Fair or Inc Magazine (who published the original article[0]) just made up his quotes about an interest in parabiosis as well.
Calling it a "generated" (by that I assume you mean fabricated?) piece seems a bit hyperbolic.
[0]http://www.inc.com/jeff-bercovici/peter-thiel-young-blood.ht...
No, by "generated" I meant "generated". If I'd meant "fabricated" I'd have said it.
You can tell that this is a generated hit piece due to Thiel's politics by the very first sentence, which begins "Trump delegate and Gawker bankrupter Peter Thiel...".
I don't disagree with you that Vanity Fair is probably a bit anti-Thiel or anti-right in general, but I don't know what "generated" is supposed to mean in this context. I don't see a lot of mockery or ridicule in this particular article.
I also don't know what the "hit piece" part is supposed to be. He is a Trump delegate, he did finance Gawker's bankruptcy, he does espouse the ideals presented in the article, and he has invested in life-extension technologies. Can it be a hit piece if it's actually correct?
"He is a Trump delegate, he did finance Gawker's bankruptcy"
Both of which are totally irrelevant to the alleged topic under discussion.
The conflation of Thiel's libertarian ideals with his pursuit of life extension technologies was made by Thiel himself, as quoted in the same article:
The tone of the article doesn't seem to be mocking him, so I don't think it is a hit piece. If Peter Thiel does literally believe that injecting himself with the blood of young people will extend his life then blame him for that, not the people reporting it.“I stand against confiscatory taxes, totalitarian collectives, and the ideology of the inevitability of the death of every individual,” he (Thiel) wrote in libertarian journal Cato Unbound seven years ago.
Maybe be he reads hacker news?
Can't even make this shit up.
Billionaire vampires.
That was my initial reaction too :) but his approach to trying to solve the issues that result from aging is not unfounded.