Settings

Theme

Apple 'abandons' QuickTime on Windows

bbc.com

9 points by wckronholm 10 years ago · 17 comments

Reader

Cheyana 10 years ago

At my place of work, we are heavily invested in a web application hosted by a vendor who insisted QT was needed to play all the little sounds on the web interface that the user hears. It was literally the only reason we had to bring it into our environment, and they insisted we have it and there was no other way they could play sounds through the browser. This should be interesting.

hackuser 10 years ago

What are the most common current uses of QuickTime?

  • smt88 10 years ago

    Years ago, iTunes would aggressively push users to install QuickTime. Many will not yet have uninstalled it.

    • bsharitt 10 years ago

      Didn't iTunes initially require QuickTime?

      • ianlevesque 10 years ago

        Yes. Sounds more dramatic to say it was aggressively pushed though.

        • smt88 10 years ago

          At the time I used it (around 2006), I don't believe QuickTime was required, but it was Trojan-horsed onto me every time iTunes updated. It was an opt-out, and Apple definitely fostered the impression that it was required (it was for some features I guess).

          It also hijacked file associations without warning, which was one of the most annoying/aggressive things about it.

          I'll also add that having to install bloated garbage like iTunes in the first place was aggressive (due to Apple's policy of locking iPod owners into using iTunes), so adding another piece of bloated garbage on top of that was really irritating.

        • hackuser 10 years ago

          When I was dealing with it, it wasn't required and it was pushed - installed by default with iTunes IIRC, which of course meant that this unnecessary software was installed for almost all users.

  • ajanuary 10 years ago

    It's not common, but the product my work makes uses it as a cross-browser, cross-platform (Windows and OS X) way of embedding video into a web page with good scrubbing and multitrack audio support.

    We're replacing it with native HTML video, but comparing the number of workarounds and shims needed to get feature parity across browsers and platforms, Quicktime is certainly the easier choice. It's just not future proof.

  • RickS 10 years ago

    Media programs that use the codecs - namely adobe video stuff, but pro tools/cubase and some audio tools as well.

  • mattkrea 10 years ago

    I'm on Mac but I use it for recording my desktop multiple times per work.

    • kitsunesoba 10 years ago

      If you’re using a relatively recent version of OS X, Quicktime Player is mostly just a first-party front end for the Quicktime-replacing AV frameworks that got ported to OS X from iOS a few versions back. It probably keeps the Quicktime name only for legacy reasons and so upgraders aren’t confused as to where the default media player disappeared to.

  • wildpeaks 10 years ago

    In my case, the ability to use RGBA .mov files in After Effects.

  • KaiserPro 10 years ago

    its used as a container for a lot of TV/film work.

    Its notorious for not being colour correct, or stable.

Keyboard Shortcuts

j
Next item
k
Previous item
o / Enter
Open selected item
?
Show this help
Esc
Close modal / clear selection